Thread: Microbevels with the Shapton 30000

Originally Posted by FloorPizza

I've done the micro (or secondary) bevel with both the 30k Shapton and a couple different coticules. I went from no tape from bevel setting on the 1k Shapton on through to the 16k Shapton, then to two layers, and around 50 laps on the Shapton 30k. On the Coticules, i went no tape to two layers, and about a hundred laps with just water (the coticules were used from bevel setting all the way through. No other stones at all). All the stones gave exceptionally sharp, smooth edges.

I think the main thing I like about this method is that it is a relatively easy and *fast* way to get a darn nice shaving edge without having to mess around with pastes, etc. It's fast, easy, great results. Even a slow coticule will finish up pretty quickly with two layers of tape used to create a micro bevel. I have six blades honed this way, but not enough shaves on them to really know anything about maintaining them.

I think it is interesting that you are comparing coticules to the Shapton in you version of the study. I will have to get a super fine finishing Coti sometime soon to try also. I find the blade holds up very well and requires very little stropping with a month into using mostly my Challenge full hollow. I only used one piece of tape and no more than a dozen laps on the 30K.
Your idea sounds like it opens up the next step to compare the various finishers out there since this type of edge finish really isolates the effect of the stone. That is the only scientific part of this study since there is no control. I know lots of members are loving the Japanese Naturals, what better way to find out what that stone is really leaving the edge like than a micro. Also, with only one piece of tape you are not changing the shaving angle a significantly, which is a better shave IME. (Earlier experiments i did with steeper micros on wedges were not as good because of the higher angle attack while shaving is not enjoyable to me) I would say two pieces of tape are not changing anything too much.

Also Bart, I read up on your earlier work with secondary bevels. lots of thought and awesome study and tribute to the coticule. I hope you understand the simplicity of this study in contrast to your earlier work.
Michael