Results 11 to 14 of 14
18LikesThread: doesn't look right
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks-
05-18-2015, 06:00 PM #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Location
- Apex NC
- Posts
- 534
Thanked: 90
Yeah I knew they had them in different forms back before 1700 just didn't think they looked just like ones from 1775 in 1634. So it is interesting to me that when I have a razor from a maker that was around 1765-1795 someone can say based on the shape that it is later than 1775. I like the shape of these razors and am trying to find out more about them. Plus when I buy a razor I like to try and figure out an approximate date based on maker marks and shape. I guess shape does not help much on these older style razor though from what I am seeing.
-
04-06-2016, 06:03 PM #12Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Galiza
- Posts
- 208
Thanked: 47
The grafitti seems athentic, is the same razor, isn´t it?celticcrusader likes this.
-
04-06-2016, 06:15 PM #13Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Merthyr Tydfil South Wales UK.
- Posts
- 5,601
Thanked: 1413
Looks pretty authentic to me.
“Wherever you’re going never take an idiot with you, you can always find one when you get there.”
-
04-06-2016, 06:26 PM #14Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Location
- Denmark
- Posts
- 328
Thanked: 232
Links don't last forever
-
The Following User Says Thank You to DNM For This Useful Post:
Steel (04-07-2016)
Reply With Quote