Results 1 to 10 of 13
Thread: Honemeister sharp
Threaded View
-
11-12-2008, 10:07 PM #8
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Belgium
- Posts
- 1,872
Thanked: 1212Floorpizza, I couldn't help myself having a great laugh while I read your post. Not that I don't symphatize with you, but the way you expressed your frustration is just plain comical genius. "Glen Sharp... " I guess that's something like "Owens Quick" or "Hickock Fast".
And you're not even treating it fair: Glen Sharp becomes duller with each use and you're comparing it to your freshly honed edge. Totally unfair, and when Glen reads this, he 's going to be very upset.
But seriously, having a perfectly honed razor is an advantage when you're learning the skill yourself, but if you allow it to cause despair, you're not doing justice to yourself.
Learning how to hone takes time. You don't need to aim for immortal sharpness, right from square one. The first thing you need to accomplish is basic shavereadiness. Such a razor shaves well without hanging up on hairs or hurting you while you shave and does not cause skin irritation that lasts longer than 10 minutes after the shave. Once you can achieve that, you can try to expand your horizon. But even then, the results are always a combination of 4 things: your knowlegde, your skills to bring the knowledge into practice, the capabilities of your honing tools, the capacity of the razor to take the edge you're aiming for. There's really no shortcut for either one of those. You can buy the same set of hones Glen uses. You can buy a razor that you know to take an awesome edge. You can read everything there is to know. But you can't rush the time it takes you to really figure it out and you can't rush the time it takes to train your cerebrum for controlling a good honing stroke.
On a slightly more practical note. Honing is not very complicated, but it is very easy to throw in a monkey wrench somewhere during the progression. Once happened, the results will always be flawed, until you go back and take corrective action. This means that if 50 laps on your Chinese 12K don't cut it, 50 more laps will hardly ever solve the problem. The problem is earlier in your honing sequence. The "double your stroke count each time you step up to a fine hone" makes no sense. There are way too much variables at stake to rely on such a simple rule. The double amount is usually more than what is needed. On some hones this introduces a risk for overhoning and it always introduces the risk that you loose concentration and perform one off-stroke. Suppose you accidently lift the spine during half a stroke. Because the entire honing action is briefly diverted to the tip of the edge, that always causes significant rounding. If it happens on a fast hone in the bevel-setting range, the next strokes will correct the flaw, provided that you don't loose it again. If the same thing happens on a finishing hone, that hone might not be able to correct the resulting roundness. (cfr. my blue sentence).
One of the most difficult lessons I had to learn with regards to honing, was to stop all wishfull thinking. If a test, whether that's a TNT, TPT, cutting arm hair or a hanging hair, tells me something 's off at a certain stage during the honing process, I know now that will never rectify itself miraculously. If you throw all the right parts into a car, you will never accidentally get a working engine, no more than you will get a sharp razor without succesfully completing each separate stage.
I took me over three months before I could hone a razor to basic shavereadiness with some confidence. I bet you'll have a breakthrough anytime soon, followed by another setback of course . That's just the way these things go.
All the best,
Bart.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bart For This Useful Post:
BeBerlin (11-12-2008), FloorPizza (11-12-2008)