Originally Posted by
crouton976
Gugi, Spendur, I'm unsure if your two previous comments are directed at me. If not, then disregard this post.
If they are, I would only say that the idea of a person being able to decide for themselves what say they have about living their life as they see fit is nothing new, nor is it irrational. It's what this country's founders believed in, and what centuries of civilization have always believed in.
From religion to nature, it is a principle which is evident over and over.
The use of force, unless in self defense, is wrong. Under penalty of law, one I do not and never will agree with, I'm forced year after year to pay into a system that I shall never see give me a return on my investment. I pay into this system through income tax, property tax, sales tax, ad valorem tax, etc.
Mostly, I have little control, under the current set of laws I'm coerced into following, of how much tax I'll pay.
Do I think that we should be completely on our own, as you have pointed out, Nelson? Not completely, no, but mostly, at least at a Federal level.
Our Constituion was designed in such a way to allow for a minimal Federal Government and let the States take up the demand for further governance.
We could not be further from this original design.
I might as well be robbed at gunpoint. Between my wife and myself, we bring in approximately $75k per year, before taxes. In effect, that means we really have closer to $50k to spend.
Are we in as bad of shape as some? No, we're not. But, we're not well off either.
Given the choices in front of me, I'd rather be in the 1840's. I've proven time and again that I can rely on myself a lot more than I can on my government.
That's not ideology. That's proven history.