Results 1 to 10 of 180
Thread: A question on the constitution
Threaded View
-
02-21-2015, 12:25 AM #15
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,068
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13249After WW2 both Germany and Japan had Allied Occupational armies left in place... we (the Allies) also decimated their warfighting capabilities so the threat was pretty low.. By then the civilian populations were ready for the end of hostilities
Now leaving the whole region alone is definitely an option I can get behind but somehow I do believe that TBS's scenario of defending Israel and WW3 will be the outcome and things might be too far gone after that...
We also need to remember that simply trying to blame the US for invading Iraq like a few here are leaning on, is basically being blind to who we knocked out of power.. He was after all called the Butcher of Baghdad for a reason , he did after all invade Kuwait and also gassed over 200000 Kurds .. we should have taken him out in 1991 that was a mistake
A convenient lapse of memory,
Much like ISIS and Boko Harum, and many others practicing Genocide in the Dark corners of the world, I feel that is what we "The Western World" agreed to never let that happen again after 1945, yet we seem to forget so much..
Perhaps the answer is actually a International Warfighting Force / Merc's that instead of a UN peacekeeping mission, they are deployed by the UN to go in and hunt down and kill groups like ISIS and Boko then leave ???? If the UN can't handle that responsibility perhaps Nato,
I don't know the answer but we (The Western World) tend to sit way to long while people die, I don't think that is right or moralLast edited by gssixgun; 02-21-2015 at 12:32 AM.