Results 301 to 310 of 893
Thread: President of the US of A
-
03-12-2016, 04:47 PM #301
If Osama I mean Obama could run he would probably win again. I think the lack of a credible candidate has hurt the republican party in the past 2 elections. Their platform is outdated. They needed to reinvent themselves and perhaps that is some of Trumps appeal. If he wins the nomination it will be an incredible victory considering what he is up against. His opponents include some of the most powerful people in our country with an open checkbook and the media. The man has held his own so far. If he is elected he will surround himself with the best people for the positions. His dogged determination may just rub off on America and make us proud again.
Last edited by Hacker7; 03-12-2016 at 04:54 PM. Reason: change a name
-
03-12-2016, 05:01 PM #302
I am truly ashamed of America for even considering Donald Trump as the leader of this great country. There are no candidates worth voting for but I will be voting and NO WAY I am voting for Trump! Hilary Clinton is more of a man than that clown
Last edited by Steel; 03-12-2016 at 05:11 PM.
What a curse be a dull razor; what a prideful comfort a sharp one
-
03-12-2016, 05:05 PM #303
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,024
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13245This was a good read that just came across my feed...
A Constitutional Lesson for Donald J. Trump, Chicago, Illinois, and America:
The cancelled #TrumpRally in Chicago is a classic example of what we call in the Constitutional realm as a "Heckler's Veto."
You have freedom of speech, but that only exists until you interfere with someone else's freedom of speech. That is the difference between Liberty and freedom.
The whole reason for securing the Right to free speech is to make sure that a mob cannot shut down the speech of others.
Your Liberty ends when you interfere with another's Rights:
“Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as publick Liberty, without Freedom of Speech; which is the Right of every Man, as far as by it, he does not hurt or controul the Right of another: And this is the only Check it ought to suffer, and the only Bounds it ought to know." Silence Dogood, No. 8.
It is NOT an expression of freedom of speech to shut down someone else's speech or expression of ideas. That is not Liberty that is despotism.
Jefferson said, "One hundred and seventy-three despots would surely be as oppressive as one."
We are NOT a democracy. We are NOT mob rule. We are a Constitutional Republic where the Rights of the minority are just as important as the heckling mob.
The local law enforcement had a responsibility to make sure that the rally was NOT cancelled and those who wanted to stop it were not successful. When the "Hecklers" are successful, what you have is despotism by mob.
Greta Van Susteren is TOTALLY WRONG. Protesters NEVER have a "right" to freedom of speech to shut down someone else's speech. #Greta needs to go back to Constitutional Law class.
Local government must “provide police in such numbers as in their professional judgment are required to afford adequate protection to [protesters].” Dunlap v City of Chicago 435 F. Supp. 1295 (1977)
Local law enforcement should have never advised Trump to not have the rally. They should've said, "We will protect your Rights and make sure your speech is not stopped. It is our duty!"
It is time for America to get the proper perspective on Liberty. It is time to start defending the proper principles. How about we start spreading the Truth about Freedom of Speech, instead of the propaganda being spread by the media on this subject?
-
03-12-2016, 05:06 PM #304
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,024
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13245
-
03-12-2016, 05:13 PM #305
I just heard the mealy mouthed Kaisich (I have no idea if I'm spelling his name right) saying that Trump reaps what he sows. It's guys like him that have offered these castrated reactions to getting agendas rammed down our throats by protesters instead of pushing back on that crap. One thing I did agree with Trump on was the idea that if a protester show up throwing punches, punch back. The other candidates are responding as though that doesn't make sense.
-
03-12-2016, 05:41 PM #306
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,024
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13245
-
03-12-2016, 05:43 PM #307
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,024
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13245
-
03-12-2016, 06:08 PM #308
I'm not convinced that they would become that target because they are not promising what Trump is promising. Consequently they are all trailing him in the race. The topics that make Trump controversial are the ones I agree most with him on. It's the other stuff that concerns me. But Trump did not create a toxic environment. We live in one every day. It's just that the other candidates are letting those leftist protestors dictate what they say, and increasingly, what they do. Then someone like Trump comes along and they don't know what to do but try to silence him.
-
03-12-2016, 06:12 PM #309
Tis a long building shame that we find ourselves in a situation where we no longer vote for the best candidate but; the lesser of two evils.
~RichardBe yourself; everyone else is already taken.
- Oscar Wilde
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Geezer For This Useful Post:
ScottGoodman (03-13-2016)
-
03-12-2016, 06:18 PM #310