Results 1 to 10 of 22
Hybrid View
-
05-11-2016, 04:26 AM #1
Doesn't the government have better things to do?
Always messing with the little guy!
Glad it all got resolved!Is it over there or over yonder?
-
05-11-2016, 04:30 AM #2
O.K. I read it,,, what's with the Willow Trees ? Why does the government insist on Willow Trees?
-
05-11-2016, 04:50 AM #3
something to do with the trees roots holding ground retention to minimize erosion of the banks etc
Saved,
to shave another day.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Substance For This Useful Post:
Hirlau (05-11-2016)
-
05-11-2016, 10:23 AM #4
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 17,334
Thanked: 3228
-
The Following User Says Thank You to BobH For This Useful Post:
Hirlau (05-11-2016)
-
05-11-2016, 12:25 PM #5
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 2,516
Thanked: 369The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution declares that no person shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
Is it possible that the Federal government agreed to settle because they realize that their appointed thugs, the EPA, had acted in violation of the 5th Amendment, and imposed penalties on this man without "due process"? Could be. Maybe this wasn't so much a case of common sense, maybe more CYA.
-
05-11-2016, 01:08 PM #6
This reminds me of something. How much did the EPA fine itself when it spilled mine waste water in the Animas river of Colorado last year?
-
-
05-11-2016, 01:33 PM #7
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 2,516
Thanked: 369Unfortunately, the appointed bureaucrats of the EPA are not only immune from public opinion since they are not elected officials and can't be driven from office by legal means required by the US Constitution, they also enjoy sovereign immunity which means they do not have to fine themselves.
Everything is so much more convenient when you're above the law.