Hog, even if you allow for supernatural events and laws that are unintelligible to us, it's still holds that there are equal odds of the "creator" being an intelligent being or an interplay of different forms of energy and suffusing fields and to posit opinions on his form is an exercise in futility.

Norman, when we say supernatural, it's implied that the statement involves anything outside of the natural laws of nature. So if your view is that the order and workings of nature are what you call "god" than there is no contradiction to my statement. A natural creator is simpler than a supernatural one, but he is then bound by the laws that restrict every other constituent of the universe.