Thread: Is it possible for us as men to have a discussion on God

Originally Posted by jockeys

2. to quote from the definition of life from wikipedia (sloppy, I know, but I don't have any textbooks with me at the moment:
"There is no universal definition of life. To define life in unequivocal terms is still a challenge for scientists"

I cannot provide a citation that indicates nobody still thinks that way, because many people do. perhaps I should have stated it "most serious scientific academians have abandoned". didn't mean to be unclear.

So, what was previously scientifically accepted as fact, is now scientifically abandoned no longer valid?

And yet to say that creationism should not be taught as being valid, as it lacks a scientific basis?

What I'm getting at here is that when talking about the beginings of life, there is no scientifically proveable facts. Nothing any more scientific than what is proposed bt Creationists. Just because the guys making the guesses are scientists, does not make it scientific.