I agree that awarding the peace prize to Gore cheapens the award. I don't agree with most of Gore's policy positions, but that's not the point... I think an award like the Nobel should be given for actual accomplishments. In my view, Gore has been little more than a vocal advocate for environmental issues--and an advocate not always welcomed by those he's trying to aid.

If speaking out on an issue qualifies one for the Nobel Peace Prize, I can think of a few other people who would be qualified... Nobel-laureate Rush Limbaugh, anyone?

The science and medical awards are given for breakthroughs in those respective fields. The Peace Prize should be given for similar breakthroughs in human relations.

Just my two cents.

Josh