Thread: Turn the tables! Don't enter if your thin skinned

Originally Posted by JMS

My point was that they talked bad about America for their benefit and then apologized because that also served their purpose!

and how is that different from what Rush Limbaugh (the original topic of the thread) does? He talks bad about people who do not share his views and then he doesn't appologize because he doesn't have to and not apologizing serves his purpose of keeping his job as ultra-radical talk show host.

I don't see the logic how expressing disagreement with the decisions that the president of your country equates with talking bad about your country.

Or may be nobody ever expressed their disagreement with President Clinton during his low point?

If I'm being too provocative, please let me know - I don't have thin skin and I'm not offended by any of the postings in this thread, but may be somebody can take offense at mine. I'd just prefer a discussion instead of preaching to the choir type of thread, you know


Edit: I was posting at the same time as WB - wouldn't have posted this had I seen his post. I think his is way more interesting and better than mine and would prefer the discussion moves around what he said. Don't want to delete mine, though since it was already posted and somebody may be replying to it.