Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    55
    Thanked: 4

    Default

    Here in Sweden we make ethanol from trees!

  2. #22
    JMS
    JMS is offline
    Usagi Yojimbo JMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ramona California
    Posts
    6,858
    Thanked: 792

    Default

    I heard a story about food riots in parts of the world could be directly connected to the recent step up in the growing of corn for ethanol and that the recent skyrocketing of food prices are also linked to this! I'll see if I can't find the story.

  3. #23
    JMS
    JMS is offline
    Usagi Yojimbo JMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ramona California
    Posts
    6,858
    Thanked: 792

    Default

    here is the link:http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=412984
    My father used to always tell me that when government solves one problem they create seven more!
    I guess the proof is in the pudding huh?

  4. #24
    Born on the Bayou jaegerhund's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    1,773
    Thanked: 6

    Default

    Well -- I don't much about this stuff but I suppose beyond all the conspiracies that one can dream up about why oil production and use has been the key for the last hundred years, oil and fossil fuels are a pretty good source of energy ---with problems of course but few by comparison to alternatives.


    Justin

  5. #25
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    21
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    Justin,

    One thing you should be particularly concerned with is the fact that the ethanol being produced up in Iowa negatively affects our gulf waters. I saw this on a CNN special and maybe someone can fill in the gaps as I don't remember verbatim, but it goes something like: Their ethanol plants rely on coal for production which produces waste and they designate space for corn. Somehow the soil becomes toxic to some degree and is drained into the Mississippi which travels down and emties into the Gulf of Mexico creating a "dead zone" where no marine life can survive because of the lack of oxygen and abundance on toxins in the water. The dead zone, which already exists, begins at the shoreline and moves outward as things get progressively worse.

    On another note,the April 7, 2008 issue of TIME dedicated it's cover story to "The Clean Energy Myth" that everyone should read because it proves more or less that ethanol is pure s***, based on it's short and long-term impact on carbon emissions increased by mass deforestation, inflation in food prices, and inability to significantly decrease our dependence on imported oil." "The grain it takes to fill an SUV tank with ethanol could feed a person for a year." "Using land to grow fuel leads to the destruction of forests, wetlands and grasslands that store enormous amounts of carbon."
    They do a good job of painting a picture of the enormity of the problems that ethanol creates. Check it out, vote no for ethanol. I'd like more info on hydrogen as it seems like a great idea with few drawbacks, but I may be wrong.

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,292
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    I think you guys have the ethanol/hydrogen issues covered.

    But as Tim mentioned there are other factors to the alternative energy crisis.

    Living in Kansas has shown me that there are many natural resources not being taken advantage of. Wind farms are being implemented but very minimally so, much open space could be made use of that is just laying in wait currently (cattle pastures and unfarmable areas are good candidates).

    There are new studies involving algae that soak up sunlight and store the resulting chemical energy that can then be used as a fuel source, but they are not backed by anyone with the financial power to make them work on the scale we need.

    Many people could be installing passive water heaters to minimize natural gas use. They are essentially plastic tubs of water that are heated by the sun so that you don't have to waste as much gas heating it from cold to hot, only from warm to hot.

    There is some work going on in passive heating and cooling for houses as well. The principle is that water is circulated through pipes that are buried underground where the temperature is like 60 degrees year-round (hotter than the ambient air in the winter but colder than the ambient air in summer). Then you use the temp. of that water as a starting place for the heating/cooling system of the house thus saving the energy that would have been spent getting the air to that initial ground temp.

    I have no idea whether these will turn out to be bogus or not, but they all sound good and solid. Anyone else have knowledge along these lines?

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •