Results 1 to 10 of 65
Thread: The war in Georgia
Hybrid View
-
08-11-2008, 07:29 AM #1
The war in Georgia
Well, since the other thread deteriorated rather quickly but it is still a current event I thought I'd start a new thread and hopefully it will remain civil. I am interested to know what people think about this conflict anyways.
I believe had it not been for the war of the last few days, most people wouldn't have had any idea of what the actual situation is. So making up one's mind based on whatever information one has gotten from the media over the last few days seems a bit hasty.
I'm from the neighborhood so I was kind of aware, but I haven't followed closely and was surprised at the events. Most media coverage in US has been pro-Georgian, no surprise as the country became 'democratic' few years ago with the backing of US. Russia, of course, accused US and the west in meddling in sovereign country's business, but their interests are in South Oetia and Ankhasia regions, not in Georgia itself, so they didn't go into conflict back then. Nevertheless Russia expelled a lot of georgians who were working there and kept 'peacekeeping' forces in the autonomous provinces that are predominantly of russian etnicity.
Of course, by itself Georgia stands no chance against Russia, which has now become obvious and they have embraced the idea of joining NATO and even EU. Joining in Iraq and accepting US soldiers is just part of the price to pay.
In any case after US and EU backed the independence of Kosovo it seems a bit dishonest to consider the South Osetia and Abkhasia integral part of Georgia. It is now evident that Russia was prepared to take over, and Georgia has miscalculated their chances. It would seem that they expected once they push out the russian 'peacekeeping' forces US and EU will back them before Russia has time to react.
As I said I was surprised that Georgia started the offensive, but that's just because I haven't been following the events there. In fact they recently purchased the stockpile of soviet-type of munitions/weaponry of Bulgaria (which joined nato and transitioned to the new standards). Most certainly that didn't escape the Russians who with their strong energy positions most certainly can afford to confront the rest of the world.
What I think - bummer for the georgians, at least they supposedly got a democracy out of the deal. If they use it wisely they'll still come ahead in few generations. I can't help but wonder if the georgian government decided to just get over this conflict one way or another.
Now that this separatist problem is done, there are still few others, the most notable of which is the Kurds. And then there's Armenia/Azerbeidjan....Last edited by gugi; 08-11-2008 at 07:32 AM.
-
08-11-2008, 01:36 PM #2
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Aylesham/Canterbury, UK
- Posts
- 84
Thanked: 3It's HOW Russia has gone about this war that makes me angry!! They're using methods of warfare far outdated and, in my opinion, are hell bent on the anhialation of Georgia!
There have been claims that hundreds and hundreds of innocent South Ossetian civilians have died due to the Russian's bombing campaign. I'm sorry, but humans have now the technology of guided bombs etc and the loss of civilian life should be very minimal. I understand that in war innocent people will die but one begs to question... hundreds in a week or so???
If these claims are true, then surely the Russians (being the most secretive and sneaky bloody country in this day and age) have used the carpet bombing technique last seen in WW2!?
Rick
-
08-11-2008, 01:48 PM #3
-
08-11-2008, 02:11 PM #4
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 766
Thanked: 174Totally agree with Jordan.
It's non of my business.
But as an observer, I feel that trying to latch onto Western apron strings whilst spitting fire and blood at Mother Russia doesn't sound to me to be an intelligent way to go.
I just wish my government would have the balls to deal with Dictators like Mugabe in a similar fashion.
I feel for the citizens of both Georgia and Zimbabwe. Nobody likes war but I think Russia by it's actions will actually improve the life of the average Georgian by quickly removing the fear of war. Britains lack of action in Zimbabwe however has already ruined the lives of many more people than some quick decisive action could have prevented many years ago. We are not talking hindsight, just procrastination. Something Mother Russia is not famous for.
-
08-11-2008, 02:32 PM #5
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 1,292
Thanked: 150I'd be surprised if they didn't have the technology, but willingness to spend the extra money to use it is another question.
As for involving other nations, I'm against it. Seems like something that should have been worked out beforehand if they are looking for aid. But then again, I won't pretend to be an authority in the slightest, just an observer.
-
08-11-2008, 02:59 PM #6
Agreed, they certainly have some of the technology, but they don't have the systems as fully deployed/integrated as the western nations. And you're right, they're probably not willing to pay the extra $$ to save civilian lives...like some other countries do
Jordan
-
08-11-2008, 04:10 PM #7
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Aylesham/Canterbury, UK
- Posts
- 84
Thanked: 3How much oberving can one do before this whole thing gets out of hand??
I'm not saying in the slightest that nations need to get involved, but the UN / NATO need to act quickly because this is a very bullying stance that the Russians have employed!!
Rick
-
08-13-2008, 01:30 AM #8
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Posts
- 1,486
Thanked: 953I agree with this. In situations like this being impractical/unrealistic can get more people killed than being evil, and what would possess Georgia to provoke Putin BEFORE lining up Western support is beyond me.
I have to admit to being too ignorant to comment on this intelligently, but the situation really scares me. This is the kind of conflict that can balloon very quickly and I hope it doesn't.
I wonder if Putin has been waiting for an excuse ever since Georgia said they wanted to join NATO, or if he's always been eying it and the desire to join NATO just made him jump quicker than he might have.
-
08-13-2008, 02:57 AM #9
Russia is doing war the way she always has, total and punitive. As for Georgia she should have had her alliances together before standing up to the bear.BTW, If you have not read the Grand Chessboard by Zibignew Brezinski, it will tell you whats going on and why.
It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled. Twain
-
08-14-2008, 11:56 AM #10
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Almost but not quite round the bend
- Posts
- 203
Thanked: 16Excuse me but look at our own government it was shown that it was easer to get information out of the Russian government than ours and no other government in the world had the secrecy laws we have; the BBC did a program on it at the time.
Why should the EU or NATO send in troops to help Georgia they do not belong to either and why should we help them they are the aggressor and are now crying for help because they got their butts kicked, would they be shouting about the killings they committed if the Russians had let them get away their invasion.
It’s like a seven year old facing off to a twenty-year-old scrum half and then crying about it when he gets hurt, Georgia invaded and got repulsed not the other way round.
When are people going to forget about what Russia did in the past to their own or others how long do they or any other country have to apologise for their past, every country has things they would rather forget, which country invented modern slavery, built an empire by invading almost all of the known world, raped said countries of their natural resources, subjugated the indigenes peoples or invented concentration camps (not the Germans) but we are proud of the fact we did all but the last one which we conveniently forget about and blame the Germans for to this day.
End of rant