Results 31 to 40 of 40
-
10-16-2009, 07:55 PM #31
-
10-16-2009, 07:58 PM #32
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Waynesboro, PA
- Posts
- 997
- Blog Entries
- 6
Thanked: 199If you click the LINK that was at the beginning of that post, yes, it defines terms.
-
10-16-2009, 08:00 PM #33
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Waynesboro, PA
- Posts
- 997
- Blog Entries
- 6
Thanked: 199
-
10-16-2009, 08:01 PM #34
-
10-16-2009, 08:02 PM #35
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Waynesboro, PA
- Posts
- 997
- Blog Entries
- 6
Thanked: 199
-
10-16-2009, 08:04 PM #36
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Waynesboro, PA
- Posts
- 997
- Blog Entries
- 6
Thanked: 199WOW! Trophies are priceless?! Anyone wanna buy some trophies and ribbons I won in elementary school? I'll consider trades for Fili's, etc as well
*EDIT*
And if you want to award trophies for something, I say there should be a Mental Olympics. Oh, nm, ideas don't amount to ANYTHING compared to throwing a ball through a hoop. You could teach a monkey to do that...but try getting a monkey to come up with a new form of mathematics, come up with any of those worthless theories that that Einstein guy had...now THAT would be worthy of an award.Last edited by avatar1999; 10-16-2009 at 08:11 PM.
-
10-16-2009, 08:16 PM #37
Oh, quite correct...using their definitions, the code seems clear.
(2) “foreign government” means—
(A) any unit of foreign governmental authority, including any foreign national, State, local, and municipal government;
(B) any international or multinational organization whose membership is composed of any unit of foreign government described in subparagraph (A); and
(C) any agent or representative of any such unit or such organization, while acting as such;
(3) “gift” means a tangible or intangible present (other than a decoration) tendered by, or received from, a foreign government;
(4) “decoration” means an order, device, medal, badge, insignia, emblem, or award tendered by, or received from, a foreign government;
The bold in section 2(c) above I could see as arguable, but a weak argument from the side that would say the committee is "a representative of" the government. They are not, they represent their own goals and organizational ideals, not those of the government. As far as I can tell, this is really the only facet of this debate that is really even arguable.
The Nobel Committee is elected by the foreign government, but is not, in itself, a foreign government. The members are not members of the government. "Until 1936, members of the Norwegian government were elected to the Nobel Committee; controversy over the 1935 Peace Prize ended government involvement in the decision process, and in 1977 an official rule was adopted prohibiting members of the government from serving on the Nobel Committee. The name of the group was officially changed to the Norwegian Nobel Committee in the same year."
From: Norwegian Nobel Committee (Scandinavian organization) -- Britannica Online Encyclopedia
So if members of the government are prohibited from being on the committee, are you still claiming that what the committee gives out is from a "foreign government?"Last edited by smokelaw1; 10-16-2009 at 08:23 PM.
-
10-16-2009, 08:25 PM #38
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,032
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13246Sorry I could not resist !!!
Old Butch:
John was in the fertilized egg business.
He had several hundred young layers (hens), called 'pullets,'
and ten roosters to fertilize the eggs.
He kept records, and any rooster not performing went into the soup pot and was replaced.
This took a lot of time, so he bought some tiny bells and attached them to his roosters.
Each bell had a different tone, so he could tell from a distance, which rooster was performing.
Now, he could sit on the porch and fill out an efficiency report by just listening to the bells.
John's favorite rooster, old Butch, was a very fine specimen, but this morning he noticed old Butch's bell hadn't rung at all!
When he went to investigate, he saw the other roosters were busy chasing pullets,
bells-a-ringing, but the pullets, hearing the roosters coming, could run for cover.
To John's amazement, old Butch had his bell in his beak, so it couldn't ring.
He'd sneak up on a pullet, do his job and walk on to the next one.
John was so proud of old Butch, he entered him in the Renfrew County Fair and he became an overnight sensation among the judges.
The result was the judges not only awarded old Butch the No Bell Piece Prize but they also awarded him the Pulletsurprise as well. Clearly old Butch was a politician in the making.
Who else but a politician could figure out how to win two of the most highly coveted awards
on our planet by being the best at sneaking up on the populace and screwing them when they weren't paying attention.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:
Otto (10-16-2009)
-
10-16-2009, 08:28 PM #39
-
10-16-2009, 08:38 PM #40
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 2,516
Thanked: 369If Obama's acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize were his only breach of constitutional authority, I'd be happy.
Unfortunately the Nobel Prize is the least of it.Last edited by honedright; 10-16-2009 at 08:44 PM.