Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 83

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,034
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelP View Post
    How relevant?



    I would say very relevant.

    PS: I agree that the administration is handling that the wrong way.
    Wow, your right!! I have seen the light! Typos are unforgivable and Fox news now has no credibility.

    I now trust the other liberal medial outlets like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, ... because of their unbiased news reporting. Like the complete lack of any reporting on the Van Jones issue. The complete lack of reporting on the ACORN issues by the liberal media. The fact that they completely ignore Anita Dunn's praise of Chairman Mao Tse Dong as one of her favorite philosophers.

    How about the reliance upon fabricated evidence to try and cast a bad light upon George W. Bush?? (Remember Dan Rather and the forged memo???) That's good reporting right there, and not near as bad as typos. like I said typos are unforgivable!!

    I guess you are in favor of the government trying to crush a medial outlet, again, so long as they have typos.

    Edit: to bring this back on topic, I can't belive the Government is trying to discredit a media outlet of any type. Does Anita Dunn = Joseph Goebbels????

    Edit #2: I need to amend the last sentence in my original post, because you expressed some hesitation in the Government's actions. In what way do you think the Government should be handling this situation? Are you in favor of the government trying to discredit a news organization, and you disagree with the way this Administration is going about it, or are you against such an action outright?
    Last edited by mhailey; 10-19-2009 at 04:28 PM.

  2. #2
    Never a dull moment hoglahoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, OK
    Posts
    8,922
    Thanked: 1501
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhailey View Post
    I can't belive the Government is trying to discredit a media outlet of any type. Does Anita Dunn = Joseph Goebbels????
    maybe Fox is a threat to national security?
    Find me on SRP's official chat in ##srp on Freenode. Link is at top of SRP's homepage

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,034
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hoglahoo View Post
    maybe Fox is a threat to national security?
    If by "national security" you mean "The Obama Administration" you would be correct.

    how about the White House applying the same standard to Michael Moore? His work is based upon opinions, as are the talk shows from fox news (hannity, beck, ...)

  4. #4
    Troublus Maximus
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    In your attic, waiting for you to leave
    Posts
    1,189
    Thanked: 431

    Talking



    It's like that great tolerant and open-minded 'journalist' Bill Maher said - we (the American people) are just too stupid to know what is best for us and just need to be dragged by force where the superiorly intelligent government wants us to go - oh ya, and he praised and said that he wished that we had a dictatorship like China (ya, wouldn't that be great?).

    TO THE GULAG WITH YOU MATT !!!!


  5. #5
    BF4 gamer commiecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    2,542
    Thanked: 704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhailey View Post
    Wow, your right!! I have seen the light! Typos are unforgivable and Fox news now has no credibility.

    I now trust the other liberal medial outlets like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, ... because of their unbiased news reporting.
    Well none of those images really had typos. I guess you could call spelling "Joe" as "Joke" a typo, but I wouldn't buy that.

    This whole thing is because Fox News is opinion journalism masquerading as news. Nobody said that the other corporate news outlets were perfect -- it's just that Fox takes it to a whole other level.

    Quote Originally Posted by mhailey View Post
    The fact that they completely ignore Anita Dunn's praise of Chairman Mao Tse Dong as one of her favorite philosophers.
    lol. Well at least somebody loves Glenn Beck.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,034
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by commiecat View Post
    lol. Well at least somebody loves Glenn Beck.
    You are laughing about that?? Really? A person selcted by Obama to be one of his trusted aids and advisers is praising a man that killed 60,000,000 of his countrymen, and you laugh?

    Edit: oh, and then that person has the ability to use the Administration's reputation to try and discredit the institution that brought the statement to light. Just a little self-serving, isn't it?
    Last edited by mhailey; 10-19-2009 at 05:15 PM.

  7. #7
    BF4 gamer commiecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    2,542
    Thanked: 704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mhailey View Post
    You are laughing about that?? Really? A person selcted by Obama to be one of his trusted aids and advisers is praising a man that killed 60,000,000 of his countrymen, and you laugh?
    I was laughing at your statement. You should get a "news" show on Fox. Holy melodrama, Batman!

    It could be argued that Obama referenced one of Mao's poems in his acceptance speech. McCain said Remember the words of Chairman Mao: 'It's always darkest before it's totally black.' several times during his campaign.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,034
    Thanked: 150

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by commiecat View Post
    I was laughing at your statement. You should get a "news" show on Fox. Holy melodrama, Batman!

    It could be argued that Obama referenced one of Mao's poems in his acceptance speech. McCain said Remember the words of Chairman Mao: 'It's always darkest before it's totally black.' several times during his campaign.

    I could respond, but this would take the thread completely off topic, and it would be like talking to the Berlin Wall.

    to bring this thread back on topic, do you feel the Obama Administration should be trying to discredit a new agency that is critical of it?

  9. #9
    Little Bear richmondesi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Shreveport, LA
    Posts
    1,741
    Thanked: 760

    Default

    IMO, all American news outlets are less than satisfactory... For a good, objective take on the news, check out The Economist

  10. #10
    Senior Member ENUF2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Knoxville TN
    Posts
    946
    Thanked: 133

    Default

    Do you feel the Obama Administration should be trying to discredit a new agency that is critical of it? No any Government administration should at least be reprimanded (Like that will happen) for any such practice. News is by nature opinion bias Liberal or Conservative. Some granted are more out spoken than others but there is an agenda always like it or not.A point of view is just that a point of view. I guess you could say this is part of mine.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •