Thread: Climate change and religion

Originally Posted by fccexpert

Your use of faith based and emotionally charged words such as "deny" is proof possitive that you are operating from a religious rather than scientific framework. I do not deny anything, but I am skeptical of the current hypothesis that human activity is the source of the recent global warming trend. If sufficient evidence is presented to change my mind, then I will have no problems doing so.

I have listed a series of damages done to our environment by human beings, each of which I have heard denied by various people at various times. You say you deny nothing, therefore, do you agree that humans have caused serious damage to the Earth's ecosystem?

Although your statement that my use of the word "deny" is "faith based", "emotionally charged" and "religious" is very funny, your argument is foolish. I asked an honest, appropriate question. You can choose to answer it or not but hurling nonsensical insults is unecessarily caustic.