Results 1 to 10 of 117

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    27,068
    Thanked: 13249
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Although this started off on the wrong foot, there is actually some fact basis for his argument...

    the American military made concessions before with many Religions...

    the Amish and Quakers come to mind quickly...In fact many skipped Military service during Vietnam by converting to Islam

    My reading today came across this: full story here

    It was Major Hasan, though, who increasingly felt let down by the military, and deeply conflicted by his religion, said those who knew him through the mosque. Duane Reasoner Jr., an 18-year-old substitute teacher whose parents worked at Fort Hood, said Major Hassan was told he would be sent to Afghanistan on Nov. 28, and he did not like it.
    “He said he should quit the Army,” Mr. Reasoner said. “In the Koran, you’re not supposed to have alliances with Jews or Christian or others, and if you are killed in the military fighting against Muslims, you will go to hell.”


    I cannot find if this is truthfully or not, in the Koran?????? or if this was just perhaps his own twisted interpetation...????
    Last edited by gssixgun; 11-07-2009 at 09:08 PM.

  2. #2
    Retired Developer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    3,490
    Thanked: 1903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gssixgun View Post
    I cannot find if this is true or not in the Koran?????? or if this was just perhaps his own twisted interpetation...????
    I would not hold my breath, تفسير‎ most certainly isn't your friend here. But there is not such thing as "his own interpretation" with respect to the Qur'an, you need to be a 'مُفسر‎,.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    manchester, tn
    Posts
    938
    Thanked: 259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BeBerlin View Post
    I would not hold my breath, تفسير‎ most certainly isn't your friend here. But there is not such thing as "his own interpretation" with respect to the Qur'an, you need to be a 'مُفسر‎,.
    sir, what are you trying to hide. most of cannot read or understand what you have said in you post completely. you as a moderator and a man of education should know that not understanding each other completely is what divides us and causes friction and misunderstanding.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to 59caddy For This Useful Post:

    Brother Jeeter (11-08-2009)

  5. #4
    JMS
    JMS is offline
    Usagi Yojimbo JMS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ramona California
    Posts
    6,858
    Thanked: 792

    Default

    BeBerlin. I don't particularly care for this thread either but I agree with 59caddy on this point:
    sir, what are you trying to hide. most of cannot read or understand what you have said in you post completely. you as a moderator and a man of education should know that not understanding each other completely is what divides us and causes friction and misunderstanding.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to JMS For This Useful Post:

    59caddy (11-07-2009)

  7. #5
    Retired Developer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    3,490
    Thanked: 1903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 59caddy View Post
    sir, what are you trying to hide. most of cannot read or understand what you have said in you post completely. you as a moderator and a man of education should know that not understanding each other completely is what divides us and causes friction and misunderstanding.
    Trying to hide? Interesting. The point I was trying to make is that there are many misconceptions of Islam. Case in point, that somebody could interpret the Qur'an on his own. It takes tafsīr (تفسير‎) for that, tafsīr being the Arabic word for "exegesis" or "commentary". An author of tafsīr is called a mufassir ( 'مُفسر‎,).

    I still cannot follow the logic in your original post: "the point is why we take any chance with our men and women" would, based on your line of reasoning, be equally applicable to any non-Judeo-Christian religion. Not to mention atheists or agnostics. And what would happen if the next shooter was a Protestant?

  8. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    manchester, tn
    Posts
    938
    Thanked: 259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BeBerlin View Post
    Trying to hide? Interesting. The point I was trying to make is that there are many misconceptions of Islam. Case in point, that somebody could interpret the Qur'an on his own. It takes tafsīr (تفسير‎) for that, tafsīr being the Arabic word for "exegesis" or "commentary". An author of tafsīr is called a mufassir ( 'مُفسر‎,).

    I still cannot follow the logic in your original post: "the point is why we take any chance with our men and women" would, based on your line of reasoning, be equally applicable to any non-Judeo-Christian religion. Not to mention atheists or agnostics. And what would happen if the next shooter was a Protestant?

    again i go back to the point that i have stated already. these are statements to get the thoughts of others here. you did not see me say we were to ban anyone from the service. i am seeking information from different points of view, not only for myself but for others to learn from.
    the more we learn about each other generally brings more understanding.

  9. #7
    Retired Developer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    3,490
    Thanked: 1903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 59caddy View Post
    you did not see me say we were to ban anyone from the service.
    "the point is why we take any chance with our men and women. there are other ways for american muslims to serve our nation without being in the military." Let's apply some basic punctuation and pragmalinguistics, shall we? "The point I am trying to make is: Why do we take any chances with our soldiers? American muslims should not serve in the US Army." Not applying question marks to a rhetoric question still makes it an indirect speech act.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •