Thread: Unconstitutional Action and Gun Laws

I have been recently hammered about the North Carolina incident and its unconstitutional actions. My question how is the Supreme Court able to ignore the second amendment and yet claim legitimacy when they allow unconstitutional gun laws in NYC and Washington D.C.? Either they uphold the whole document or they are themselves derelict in their duty to defend it and are treasonous. It'd funny they won't defend the document directly, but will defend it in areas of elections. Why? D.C. is their home town and yet there they disregard the constitution.
Here are two versions of the Amendment off Wikipedia:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Clearly these gun laws infringe the rights of people to bear arms IMO.

This is opinion only so lets keep it friendly. Please.