Quote Originally Posted by ENUF2 View Post

It use to only take 2 witnesses to condemn some to death for a crime. In the US someone is innocent until proven guilty. There is ample evidence here showing Jesus to be who He said He is. The Defense rests. Now let's see the evidense prosecution has to the contrary. Any takers?

Evidence will only influence, Proof only comes in a changed opinion or life in the case of salvation.
Evidence is a contributor to proof.
–noun
1. that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.

That's the dictionary, not the Bible.

I'll play along with your "proof" of Jesus existing, but you have squat (outside of the testaments of people who believe blindly in things) in terms of proving that "He is who He says He is". As I mentioned before, I said "Yes" in the poll, but mentioned that it didn't matter because that's not what's important in history. Anybody can exist. Nobody can be immortal.

If you want to use courtroom speak, the prosecution rests. And good luck getting a jury to indict based on your "evidence".


EDIT: By the way, how did we wind up as the prosecution? We aren't prosecuting anybody. We are the jury. We require evidence to convict.