Thread: DANNY GLOVER AS BAD AS PAT ROBERTSON

Originally Posted by Blade Wielder

I listened to the clip and it was pretty incoherent. I'm assuming that bit at the end about the climate change summit is the reason you posted this?

It seems like you're grasping at straws, though. I mean, both Glover and Robertson are well-known people - but the difference is, one acts likes a spokesperson for God and has an audience that is crazy enough to believe that he is, while the other is just some actor nobody's heard of since the Lethal Weapon movies.

Don't worry, you'll find something that carries the same weight - you'll probably just have to bide your time.

that figures. you missed the point completely or just ignored it. the point being that both the right and left have people that make serious blunders.
i could reference many comments both right and left that are both stupid and outlandish. this thread was in response to the one about pat and his big mistake.
calling all of pat robertsons followers crazy shows how intolerant you are of someones views that you do not adhere to. calling someone crazy for their beliefs in Christ and his teachings taught by someone(anyone) is ludicrous.
danny glover has been all over the news for the last few years. all you have to do is look and listen for him and he pops up quite often.

Originally Posted by 59caddy

that figures. you missed the point completely or just ignored it. the point being that both the right and left have people that make serious blunders.

If I ever miss your intended point, know that it's likely to do with your slippery grasp on the English language.

In this case, no, I'm not wearing my "blunder blinders." I think Glover sounded like a babbling idiot in that recording. However, I understood the point he was making. Like Robertson (I'm assuming), he wants to help the suffering Haitian people. Unlike Robertson, he's not talking about signed pacts with the Devil. They're just not "serious blunders" of the same caliber, you know? Robertson's would be a 45-70, while Glover's would be more like a .22 short.

Originally Posted by Blade Wielder

If I ever miss your intended point, know that it's likely to do with your slippery grasp on the English language.

ok, so let us resort to the personal ridicule or attacks....typical

Originally Posted by 59caddy

ok, so let us resort to the personal ridicule or attacks....typical

Hey, you're the one who just told me in the Kick-Ass thread that you like to eat barbequed monkey (clearly implying that you were going to kill and then cannibalize me).

Originally Posted by Blade Wielder

Hey, you're the one who just told me in the Kick-Ass thread that you like to eat barbequed monkey (clearly implying that you were going to kill and then cannibalize me).

Since 59caddy is a car and you are a monkey I don't see how cannibalization even enters into the picture.

Originally Posted by Blade Wielder

Hey, you're the one who just told me in the Kick-Ass thread that you like to eat barbequed monkey (clearly implying that you were going to kill and then cannibalize me).

never said anything about you. you just assumed that.
besides how does one cannibalize a monkey(cannibals eat humans not monkeys) now who lost the grip?
also see above post about cadillacs

"The Left" and "the Right"? Are you actually claiming Pat Robertson as yours, now? Is an attack on him an attack on you? Cause let me tell you, at our soopah seekrit "Leftist God hating commie devil lover" meetings (Bi annual, held at The Meadows, invitation only), Danny Glover isn't even allowed in the door.

The guy is obviously delusional. He doesn't know what he's talking about. So how on earth does that reflect on "The Left"? Any more than Pat Robertson reflects on "The Right"?

We have two fruitcake statements, caddy, well done. Except, oh yeah, Pat Robertson has millions of people who hang on his every word, and he claims to be speaking for God...that's a minor difference that might need addressing.

Originally Posted by 59caddy

never said anything about you. you just assumed that.
besides how does one cannibalize a monkey(cannibals eat humans not monkeys) now who lost the grip?
also see above post about cadillacs

I don't think I'll dignify that with a response.

Instead I will refer you to JimR's post just above me, which I enjoyed.

Originally Posted by Blade Wielder

I don't think I'll dignify that with a response.

Instead I will refer you to JimR's post just above me, which I enjoyed.

if you are scared, just say you are scared, no biggie

Originally Posted by Blade Wielder

In this case, no, I'm not wearing my "blunder blinders." I think Glover sounded like a babbling idiot in that recording. However, I understood the point he was making. Like Robertson (I'm assuming), he wants to help the suffering Haitian people. Unlike Robertson, he's not talking about signed pacts with the Devil. They're just not "serious blunders" of the same caliber, you know? Robertson's would be a 45-70, while Glover's would be more like a .22 short.

Robertson said that God was punishing the Haitiians for their belief in a different God than his. Which is anti American ideals, with freedom of religion and all.

Glover said mother nature was punishing the Haitiians for our belief in a different God than his. I will help you out - his GOD and lots of other liberals is government. Which is anti American ideals, with limited government being our basic tenant of governing or at least it was.

I really dont see the difference, AFAIC Glover is shooting a Bazooka and Robertson is shooting blanks. Whose presence will you feel hardest, big government or God. I tend to think the later uses a hands off approach but thats just me.