Results 91 to 100 of 160
Thread: Epic overuse/misuse of words
-
03-02-2010, 12:19 PM #91
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Sussex, UK
- Posts
- 1,710
Thanked: 234
-
03-04-2010, 02:28 PM #92
I hate the words "assault weapons". WTF is an assault weapon?
-
03-04-2010, 05:12 PM #93
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Middle of nowhere, Minnesota
- Posts
- 4,623
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 1371
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
-
03-04-2010, 05:16 PM #94
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Middle of nowhere, Minnesota
- Posts
- 4,623
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 1371One other thing...
When people write "quote" and "unquote".
It's as if the reader is too stupid to know what these "" are for.
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
-
03-05-2010, 01:42 AM #95
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 1,898
Thanked: 995I heard a new one today on the radio. "You can't apply these facts blanketly..."
I think I knew what was meant from the context, a generalization. It's still a hideous adverb. What if you came from a culture that didn't know that blankets cover areas?“Nothing discloses real character like the use of power. Most people can bear adversity. But if you wish to know what a man really is, give him power.” R.G.Ingersoll
-
03-05-2010, 02:48 AM #96
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Toronto, Canada and Tysons Corner, VA (DC Metro)
- Posts
- 26
Thanked: 1So...someone mentioned the other day that people saying "Open/Closing pores" really bothers them. I tend to think that when you get down to brass tacks it doesn't it really matter. Irregardless, at the end of the day, most people understand what is meant.
Speaking of misuse - how do you feel when people say sunrise and sunset?
-
03-08-2010, 09:47 AM #97
"Literally."
I hear it all the time, and it's often used incorrectly. People just throw it into their speech nowadays whenever they want to put emphasis on something. It drives me nuts.
I remember an episode of Frasier when one of the callers on his radio show was talking about his mother's neurotic behavior, adding that she "literally drives me up the wall sometimes." As politely as possible, Frasier told him that by saying that, he was suggesting that he was actually digging his fingernails into the drywall and physically clawing his way to the ceiling! Ha!
So anyway, people should really only use that word if there's any ambiguity in something they're saying.
-
03-08-2010, 11:35 AM #98
-
03-11-2010, 04:56 PM #99
The purpose of language is to convey an idea from one person to another. Many of us would like to delineate an image of being well educated, articulate, and classy.
This is accomplished by observing the formal rules of language, proper vocabulary and the avoidance of ambiguity.
Well with the reports of Toyotas and "unintended acceleration" you never know! Although the one the other day only managed 90mph over about 30 minutes so I expect you're correct.
I most commonly assault people using harsh words on internet forums, thus I believe my keyboard is probably an "assault weapon". All of my black scary guns are tucked away in a safe and haven't been used for any sort of assault at least since I've owned them. I suspect the most common assault weapon is the human mind.
-
03-13-2010, 01:04 AM #100
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Toronto, Canada and Tysons Corner, VA (DC Metro)
- Posts
- 26
Thanked: 1HAHA - is that the purpose of language? That's good to know.
The more pedantic one gets over the misuse of words (and the telling of others about it) the more they look like a snobby, pretentious . Some people then develop the exact reverse image of a well educated, articulate and classy gentleman.
and exactly what do you mean by "avoiding ambiguity"?