Results 1 to 10 of 46
Hybrid View
-
05-13-2010, 09:15 PM #1
There is a real problem with the word "Atheism". Dictionaries give two definitions which are very different.
1. the doctrine or belief that there is no god.
2. disbelief in the existence of a supreme being or beings.
In my view, these two definitions make the word "atheist" useless; to answer a simple question like "Are you an atheist?", requires a counter question: "What do you mean by atheist?".
Most people who call themselves atheist (including famous atheists like Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens) actually fall under definition 2.
-
05-13-2010, 09:47 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,068
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13249
-
05-13-2010, 10:23 PM #3
An atheist believes that there is no god where as the agnostic wants to believe in god but hasn't seen any proof of existence. The difference is primarily in desire.
Last edited by red96ta; 05-13-2010 at 10:26 PM.
-
05-13-2010, 10:28 PM #4
-
05-13-2010, 10:36 PM #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Maleny, Australia
- Posts
- 7,977
- Blog Entries
- 3
Thanked: 1587I'm agnocchi - I have a fundamental disbelief in pasta being made out of potato.
James.<This signature intentionally left blank>
-
05-13-2010, 10:48 PM #6
-
05-14-2010, 12:32 AM #7
The definitions refers to general gods, not God.
There is a subtle difference between:
1. Believing something doesn't exist (positive belief)
2. Not believing something exists (negative belief)
For example on the question of the Loch Ness Monster, I would say
"I don't think the Loch Ness Monster exists."
I wouldn't say
"I think the Loch Ness Monster doesn't exist."