Results 1 to 10 of 32

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Never a dull moment hoglahoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, OK
    Posts
    8,922
    Thanked: 1501
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Is the necessity of a term limit a failure of the democratic process?
    Find me on SRP's official chat in ##srp on Freenode. Link is at top of SRP's homepage

  2. #2
    At this point in time... gssixgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    North Idaho Redoubt
    Posts
    27,159
    Thanked: 13249
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hoglahoo View Post
    Is the necessity of a term limit a failure of the democratic process?

    Honestly??? yes I believe it is,,, Half the term of the politician is to set themselves up for re-election so perhaps with term limits they will be more concerned with getting there, getting the job done, and getting the heck home...
    It will also put a huge monkey wrench in the whole PAC and special interest money and influence machine...
    Last edited by gssixgun; 10-18-2010 at 10:19 PM.

  3. #3
    Know thyself holli4pirating's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    11,930
    Thanked: 2559

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gssixgun View Post
    Half the term of the politician is to set themselves up for re-election so perhaps with term limits they will be more concerned with getting there, getting the job done, and getting the heck home...
    It will also put a huge monkey wrench in the whole PAC and special interest money and influence machine...

    This makes me laugh. Because whenever I think about what I dislike about any organization of people, the main two things that come to mind are "internal politics" and "bureaucracy." I wonder if anyone actually has a positive connotation for either term.

    I do think restructuring the allowed number of terms could be a good thing. So could downplaying the role of special interest groups (lots of ways to do that, I don't think I could even count). Both would stop politicians from spending so much time covering their own butts and force them to do... um... their jobs - serving the public. Politics is not a career, it is a service.

    I also strongly agree with Nun's post above mine - the failure lies largely with the electorate; that is the failure of the democratic process.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to holli4pirating For This Useful Post:

    nun2sharp (10-19-2010)

  5. #4
    what Dad calls me nun2sharp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kansas city area USA
    Posts
    9,173
    Thanked: 1677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hoglahoo View Post
    Is the necessity of a term limit a failure of the democratic process?

    Yes. The people have been content to sit on their butts and think its a my party versus theirs scenario, most times without considering what is really going on. Far too many elections are more like Pro wrestling events, the Masked Avenger versus the Challenger. They step into the ring amidst the cheers and jeers throwing each other around until the scenario plays out. Then they head for the showers, pick up their pay envelopes and head to the bar together laughing at the rubes in the audience who think it real.

    We need to be more involved as an electorate, we need to ask the questions instead of the hand picked commentators, and we need to expect real answers in plain English that can be understood. There are many other issues that need to be discussed, but I still put the majority of the blame on a lazy electorate that will not educate itself and will look to the politicians for leadership when it is the responsibility of the electorate to be the leadership.
    It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled. Twain

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •