Results 11 to 20 of 32
Thread: American Politics Anyone?
-
10-18-2010, 09:44 PM #11
I'm all for term limits and massive campaign finance reform. Matter of fact, we should do away with lobbying and private contributions. There'd be details to iron out, but we could have campaigns that were government-funded (at an appropriately low level) and basically restrict campaigning to a website, a monthly newspaper insert, and debates on public TV (C-Span, etc.).
No chance in hell of that happening, of course.
-
10-18-2010, 09:54 PM #12
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,033
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13247
Honestly??? yes I believe it is,,, Half the term of the politician is to set themselves up for re-election so perhaps with term limits they will be more concerned with getting there, getting the job done, and getting the heck home...
It will also put a huge monkey wrench in the whole PAC and special interest money and influence machine...Last edited by gssixgun; 10-18-2010 at 10:19 PM.
-
10-18-2010, 09:54 PM #13
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Middle of nowhere, Minnesota
- Posts
- 4,624
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 1371I'm all for public executions of people that don't live up to campaign promises.
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
-
10-18-2010, 10:06 PM #14
I understand your position if true; however, in direct questioning of White House staff, they cannot produce any evidence of this ... they are only speculating. Their response ... "can you prove it's not true"? The fact that they have no source or evidence of this, but decided to throw it out there in hopes it would stick kind of p****es me off. The fact that many only heard the accusation, and have developed opinions based on that, and not the later "fact check" demonstrates the effectiveness of this deceit.
-
10-18-2010, 10:29 PM #15
But how does one "fact check" if a lobbying interest, in this case the Chamber of Commerce, is non-transparent, and keeps it's books closed? It's this lack of transparency from most PAC's (of both parties) that presents a great case for their elimination. It seems as though the framers ideal of a government created "of by and for the people" we have somehow allowed to be turned into "of by and for the PAC and corporate lobbyist". Enough is enough!
-
10-18-2010, 10:39 PM #16
-
10-18-2010, 10:43 PM #17
I feel similar, term limits would help. I think the other big change we need is to reduce their salary and and set spending limits for campaigns. We pay teachers and policemen very little and justify it by saying "You get satisfaction from your work". I think the same should hold true for politicians. This would mean that the people in office actually care and that you don't have to be a billionaire or have special interest groups in your pocket to be able to successfully run for office. By and far, the people should be represented by "real people", not people who "pretend" to "understand".
I can't be hard on the politicians without being hard on "the people" as well. Looking at the turnout rate for elections, I find this to be very frustrating. I have always believed that if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem...so VOTE!
-
10-18-2010, 10:45 PM #18
Well, if you have term limits and get rid of lobbyists and big contributers who's gonna run for office. There won't be any incentive since you can't become rich and powerful anymore.
No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero
-
10-18-2010, 11:31 PM #19
TGood point. (insert semi-sarcastic tone) it's not like anyone would want to run for office for the purpose of actually doing something good for people... (sarcasm switch off).
Call me old fashioned, or an idiot, or whatever, but I just can't help but believe that there are still some people in this country who actually care about the people.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bandman For This Useful Post:
JMS (10-18-2010), Philadelph (10-19-2010)
-
10-19-2010, 12:57 AM #20
I'm waiting for the next presidential election
Yeth. It ithn't halping at awl
It's a terrible party
Of course not, mine is perfect. Elect the hoglacrats in 2012!
I told you, I'm waiting for the next presidential election. Cat got your ear?
Hahahahaha
Well, as far as how the thread has developed, I am all for term limits as long as my term is for life and everyone else's terms already expired. Hoglahoo for world domination! Woohoo!Find me on SRP's official chat in ##srp on Freenode. Link is at top of SRP's homepage
-
The Following User Says Thank You to hoglahoo For This Useful Post:
nun2sharp (10-19-2010)