Results 1 to 10 of 230
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksHybrid View
-
12-23-2010, 03:46 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 272
Thanked: 19
I assume you're referring to me. What are you claiming I was misleading about?
Originally Posted by richmondesi
Nice use of canard, though.
See, this is the problem with discussing things with atheists that I've seen. Deliberately misleading, huh? ... Sweet
-
12-23-2010, 03:56 PM #2Little Bear
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Shreveport, LA
- Posts
- 1,741
Thanked: 760
You know what happens when you assume, right? Originally Posted by NYCshaver
-
12-23-2010, 04:50 PM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 272
Thanked: 19
Why are you being so hostile? Originally Posted by richmondesi
-
12-23-2010, 04:52 PM #4This is not my actual head.
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Middle of nowhere, Minnesota
- Posts
- 4,624
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 1371
Why are all the questions in this thread answered with questions?
It's starting to look like a game of "Who's Line is it Anyway?"
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
-
12-23-2010, 04:56 PM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 32,564
Thanked: 11044
Seems no one has the answer. Threads like these go on and on. I guess he who has the last word wins ? Trouble is they never end. Originally Posted by HNSB
Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
12-23-2010, 05:12 PM #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Posts
- 242
Thanked: 45
What's wrong with that? Originally Posted by HNSB
-
12-23-2010, 05:15 PM #7This is not my actual head.
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Middle of nowhere, Minnesota
- Posts
- 4,624
- Blog Entries
- 2
Thanked: 1371
Did I say there was anything wrong with that?
Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
-
12-23-2010, 05:00 PM #8Little Bear
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Shreveport, LA
- Posts
- 1,741
Thanked: 760
That's not hostile in the least. I made a direct reference to something posted, you assumed that it was directed at you (It's funny because there's zero chance it could have been directed at you... literally), and I quipped a reference to Oscar Wilde. That's levity, not hostility. Originally Posted by NYCshaver
Last edited by richmondesi; 12-23-2010 at 05:05 PM.
-
12-23-2010, 05:11 PM #9Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 272
Thanked: 19
I see now. Didn't see the subject of TheMetatron's post. Originally Posted by richmondesi
That's not hostile in the least. I made a direct reference to something posted, you assumed that it was directed at you, and I quipped a reference to Oscar Wilde. That's levity, not hostility.
So what is he being misleading about?
-
12-23-2010, 05:16 PM #10Little Bear
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Shreveport, LA
- Posts
- 1,741
Thanked: 760
Wow... he wasn't. He accused me of being misleading by mentioning entropy and then "explained" how I didn't understand the 2nd law of thermodynamics. So, remembering how he cordially invited us to move this discussion to another forum where we would never be attacked personally, I thought it funny that he called my comments a canard (in effect saying that I, or whoever initially referenced it, was intentionally misleading people which I classify as a personal attack)... Originally Posted by NYCshaver
Maybe the lack of reading/listening for comprehension is a problem that both sides have when discussing these types of things... Cheers
