Results 1 to 10 of 116
Hybrid View
-
03-06-2011, 11:22 PM #1
The issue is not when you work one job and retire, then take up a second job and retire. That is totally legal.
The issue is that one person would hold 2 jobs at the same time. Each job would be "full time" but the employee would only work a portion of a week on each job. Now, you have one person, possibly working one job 80-90% (if you are lucky) of the time and giving lip service to a second job. He is earning a pension on both but only doing the work of one.
-
03-06-2011, 11:37 PM #2
Does this actually happen beyond small number of cases that add up to no financial impact? It seems rather odd if somebody can do two full time jobs simultaneously. And in any case it looks to me something that would be done by a middle or high level executive rather than a teacher. Numbers would be nice.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to gugi For This Useful Post:
nun2sharp (03-12-2011)
-
03-06-2011, 11:54 PM #3
It is not teachers and blue collar workers that are the culprits here. It is always a politically appointed position given to someone who is already a state employee (usually members of the legislative branch).
As far as numbers, it can't be that many at one time. The problem is that it has occurred over many years. Over time, even a small chink in the armor can be catastrophic.
-
03-07-2011, 12:21 AM #4
Right, but those officials are elected, or appointed by elected officials, and tasked with making decisions on behalf of the taxpayers. So, when they screw up the taxpayers are still on the hook for those bad decisions.
What the current political majority in Wisconsin is saying is that it's too bad the guys before us messed it up, now we're going to fix it by just giving a round of tax breaks and just alter the contracts on the low level government employees.
(Anybody still remember the big outcry a couple of months ago over the unfairness of taking an extra 1-2cents on every dollar over $250,000/year? Way better to take 3-10cents on the dollar from all these government employees making $30,000-$80,000/year.)
What I see is just lot of politics and very little interest in addressing the problem in a meaningful way.
-
03-07-2011, 12:34 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Stay away stalker!
- Posts
- 4,578
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 1262
-
03-07-2011, 12:35 AM #6
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Stay away stalker!
- Posts
- 4,578
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 1262I was surprised by this quote from Reagan...
"These are the values inspiring those brave workers in Poland ... They remind us that where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost." --Ronald Reagan, Labor Day Address at Liberty State Park, 1980
-
03-07-2011, 12:51 AM #7
Dont be. It is the usual political double talk, whatever works at the moment type of comment. This is the same guy who as a Democrat was President of the Screen Actors Guild, as well as the same guy who as a Republican POTUS said that Air Traffic Controllers could not organize or negotiate. Power and money are a good thing in my hands, not so much in yours.
It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled. Twain
-
03-11-2011, 12:00 PM #8
That's called hypocrisy I guess. Although I believe this statement to be correct.
Not being american I'm not going to get involved in the discussion, but I just wanted to say that it really really saddens (and frightens) me to see the US sliding away towards what I see as a modern kind of fascism. And so many of you just don't see this or worse maybe, just don't care. Your country deserves better than this.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to decraew For This Useful Post:
HarleyFXST (03-12-2011), nun2sharp (03-12-2011)
-
03-07-2011, 12:52 AM #9
-
03-07-2011, 12:44 AM #10
Yeah, I can't comment on the Wisconsin issue with any accuracy. I won't pretend to know much about that.
But as far as NJ's double dipping, the taxpayers are always on the hook for the mistakes of elected politicians. Hell, we did elect them.
We allowed the politicians to appoint their buddies into positions, then failed to remove those politicians from their offices. IMO, it would do NJ a ton of good to elect a majority of Republicans in the upcoming election in order to try and balance out the state. I am not arguing for one party over the other here, but I feel that a balance of each party is something that is beneficial. We have been a democrat led state for too long.