View Poll Results: What happened
- Voters
- 45. You may not vote on this poll
-
The Lone Gunman
16 35.56% -
A conspiracy of some kind (regardless of who)
29 64.44%
Results 1 to 10 of 66
Hybrid View
-
11-30-2011, 10:33 PM #1
-
11-30-2011, 10:44 PM #2It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled. Twain
-
11-30-2011, 11:37 PM #3
decided to remove my post. Sorry.
Last edited by Mvcrash; 12-01-2011 at 01:05 AM.
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.”
Albert Einstein
-
12-01-2011, 02:26 PM #4
-
11-30-2011, 11:07 PM #5
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Columbia Pacific, Pacific North Wet
- Posts
- 702
Thanked: 90Ask the FBI for their records on someone, anyone. See how cooperative they are. FOIA means you can get your own (if they have any), but not anyone else.
There is nothing exceptional about the FBI's reticence with Ruby's files. The FBI (especially under Hoover, but still to this day) keeps extensive records on a lot of people. Whether you are involved in socialist political party activities, protesting the war (the FBI actually had informants in Quaker groups because of their anti-war position), a member of a mosque, or are a friend of a friend of a mobster, they have a file with your name on it. It may not have much, but they won't share it. They are not forthcoming with those files because it would be a breech of an individual's privacy, it would tip off others who are under active surveillance, and (more importantly) it would expose the level of government scrutiny that many "average joes" are subjected to. Ruby, Being a nightclub owner, was probably only two people removed from lots of mobsters, so I's not to far fetched that he'd get written up in more than one surveillance report.Last edited by joesixpack; 11-30-2011 at 11:09 PM.