Whats your opinion on automatic weapons?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HNSB

I believe he would have killed more people if he didn't have access to a firearm.

---

How? Explosives aren't a piece of cake.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by parkerskouson

No reason. Uncontrolable temper is the issue. If someone wanted someone dead, there so many other ways to kill them. People kill people, not guns.

---

Yeah, but they're not going to kill the NUMBERS of people. What are they gonna do? Stand there with a long bow and a quiver of arrows? Yes, of course acts of terrorism via bombs, planes, gas etc are going to happen, but at least what seems to be a disturbingly common method in your country will be curtailed. To be honest, I don't know how you all live with it, esp when it comes to your people killing people in schools. I find it really disturbing. In know some weirdo is always going to get a gun (or make one) but I still ask, how many of those people in the theatre were shooting back...

None? Oh, I thought the gun ownership laws protected them?

Bleach, Petroleum Jelly, Candle Wax, Stove. In about 30 minutes you can make what they used to fill grenades in WW1. I wont bore you with the scientific terms.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by straightrazorheaven

How? Explosives aren't a piece of cake.

---

It has taken 2 days to disarm all the explosives he had booby trapping his apartment.

If someone is crazy enough to want to kill a lot of people, there is no need for guns or explosives.

Somebody earlier said that the theater had a "no guns" policy. The fact still remains that had they been carrying guns, would it have changed anything, the guy rolled in a canister of tear gas first anyway. TEAR GAS, where the hell did a member of the public get a canister of tear gas?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by carlmaloschneider

Yeah, but they're not going to kill the NUMBERS of people. What are they gonna do? Stand there with a long bow and a quiver of arrows? Yes, of course acts of terrorism via bombs, planes, gas etc are going to happen, but at least what seems to be a disturbingly common method in your country will be curtailed. To be honest, I don't know how you all live with it, esp when it comes to your people killing people in schools. I find it really disturbing. In know some weirdo is always going to get a gun (or make one) but I still ask, how many of those people in the theatre were shooting back...

None? Oh, I thought the gun ownership laws protected them?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by carlmaloschneider

Yeah, but they're not going to kill the NUMBERS of people. What are they gonna do? Stand there with a long bow and a quiver of arrows? Yes, of course acts of terrorism via bombs, planes, gas etc are going to happen, but at least what seems to be a disturbingly common method in your country will be curtailed. To be honest, I don't know how you all live with it, esp when it comes to your people killing people in schools. I find it really disturbing. In know some weirdo is always going to get a gun (or make one) but I still ask, how many of those people in the theatre were shooting back...

None? Oh, I thought the gun ownership laws protected them?

---

Movie theater banned the guns. Perfect legal because it is a private property, which the govt can't touch. If there hadn't been that restriction, I be willing to bet someone would have shot back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by straightrazorheaven

,,,,,,,,, I watched a documentary with the famous Michael Moore,,,,,,,.

---

OMG,
hang in there, StraightRazorHeaven, we might still be able to save you ! Attachment 101900

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by straightrazorheaven

Somebody earlier said that the theater had a "no guns" policy. The fact still remains that had they been carrying guns, would it have changed anything, the guy rolled in a canister of tear gas first anyway. TEAR GAS, where the hell did a member of the public get a canister of tear gas?

---

Probably in the parking lot after the gun show!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HNSB

If someone is crazy enough to want to kill a lot of people, there is no need for guns or explosives.

---

This is true, but they aren't going to do it all at once, I think the people would have had something to say about it had he been unarmed.