Thread: More Than Meets the Eye....

Friends, there is a gift that God has given me: I can smell something fishy a mile away. Like Benghazi. Almost on day one, I told my husband: “The facts don’t make sense. Something is wrong here.” Last night, after I saw a talking head interview (or, I should say, NOT interview) the father of the boy who saw his teacher get shot and ran for his life with a couple of friends, I told my husband, “Something is not right here. She didn’t ask a single relevant question. So far, this boy is the only eye-witness of the gunman coming forward. She didn’t ask if the boy saw one or more shooters. She didn’t ask any details of what the gunman did first, second, third. She didn’t ask for a description of the gunman. These reporters are complete prostitutes. They could care less about the feelings of the people they interview. So why didn’t she ask any of these questions?” In fact, I could tell she was biting back questions. I looked at my husband and said, “Cal, this thing is starting to stink. By now, there should be many eye-witness accounts of the actual gunman. There should be breathless survivors talking about how this guy walked by their room, etc. About how they narrowly escaped. But so far, it looks like every single eye-witness is dead. That is IMPOSSIBLE!”
I watched the situation LIVE. There were original reports of a second man who was found in the woods that they had put in custody. This man was NEVER spoken of again. Why? The details of the shooting changed enormously from one minute to the next. Inside sources at the police departments were reporting one thing while the official accounts said completely different information. The news reports were full of such ambiguous NON statements that I was furiously looking throughout the internet to find solid evidence or eye-witness accounts to clarify. None was to be found. One example: They originally said that the shooter was buzzed in via the front office’s new video security system. Then, the news report said, “The shooter was NOT voluntarily buzzed into the school.” What the heck does THAT mean? Does that mean he forced his way through the system? Does that mean they have video evidence of his face? Does that mean that there was someone on the inside putting a gun to someone’s head to buzz the shooter in? Huh?
Also, it seems highly unlikely, based on descriptions of Adam, that he could have purchased all that black ops gear! The guy is described as being so shy that he would hug the school walls when someone approached him! Also, first the news definitely says the mother was a teacher and the classroom of dead kids was her class. Then, reports are that she had nothing to do with the school. So, why the shooting there? Also, the number and kind of weapons used changed. Also, where they discovered the weapons. Sometimes they reported that all the weapons were in the school. Then they said the rifle was in the car. But they also said that the shooter used the rifle to kill every single person with multiple shots.
No, something stinks here. The lack of eye witnesses of the shooter confirming the single shooter account is BLARINGLY absent. The reports of a second shooter in the woods has suddenly disappeared. The reporters are not grilling the one and only witness we know of- this little boy. Please don’t say they suddenly have even a smidge of conscience. The original statements about the shooter being buzzed into the school have simply disappeared. I was ready to let this go and explain it away as simple confusion. I was maddened by the timing and circumstances of the tragedy as concerns the upcoming UN small arms treaty & gun control. It killed me that this wack-job used LEGALLY REGISTERED weapons to do his killing. There is NO OTHER CONCLUSION, if the story is accurate, than the fact that had Adam Lanza NOT had access to those legal guns, he could never have killed those kids. He was too mentally ill to have gotten those weapons himself. He was diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome and we now know that he had many, many interventions by school officials in the past. I felt that the killing of little children would be the strongest argument yet that we should clamp down on gun ownership. I just couldn’t believe the TIMING and circumstances of this event- a GIFT to the Progressives to disarm us. Who can argue with this case? I was ready for the inevitable.
But a friend sent me the following links which tell a different story. Having reported the event LIVE and experienced the changing information, I am not surprised. In fact, it makes sense now.
Friends. I believe there is evidence of more than one shooter. I believe this was a PLANNED event- specifically to get the UN Small Arms Treaty signed. The father of the shooter is Peter Lanza, rumored to be scheduled to testify on the international LIBOR scandal. Guess who else is rumored to be scheduled to testify on the LIBOR scandal? Father of the BATMAN theater shooter. Amazing coincidence? We will see. The LIBOR scandal is a massive, worldwide network of banks, the Federal Reserve and highly position individuals such as Tim Geihtner and Ben Bernanke that are being accused of manipulating LIBOR rates to gain better market positions. Just some of the Banks involved are: the Canadian branches of the Royal Bank of Scotland, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Bank, and Citibank, as well as ICAP (Intercapital), an interdealer broker.[37 It also mentions Bank of America & Barclays. It is ugly to its roots and VERY powerful people are involved.
I believe our GOVERNMENT shot those kids and teachers and used Adam Lanza and his family to pull it off. They might have killed two birds with one stone. One: If these men are involved in the LIBOR scandal, they can manipulate their testimony. Two: they get gun control. How very, very clever and efficient of them, right? I hate to say it. I hate to put myself ‘out there’ with this because I KNOW how I will be attacked. But I don’t do this for anyone’s approval.

This was copy and pasted. Not my original, but makes one think. Also the 2 small children who were killed in NYC a few months back by their nanny?.....Their Dad was linked to the Libor scandal. She was found with her throat cut and a broken neck bone and was said to have "attempted suicide"......When she woke up she recalled nothing and couldn't give details..........

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Confused reports of details in the minutes after an incedent like this are most likely to be the result of confusion and the need of journalists to fill up their 24-hr programmes. It's unlikely to be that the initial rumours were all true and the gub'nint covered it all up.

But some people just like to believe that the most likely explanation for anything is a giant secret conspiracy of evil. I've linked to this before: The Paranoid style in American politics.

Just because I am paranoid, does not mean somebody is not out to get me...

I don't give much credence to Conspiracy Theories just because they require to many people to keep a secret, now that being said the media of 20 years ago is a much different animal then today.. In the past they were after the truth and to uncover stories today the Main steam media has a very obvious agenda

Hate to think something like this could be possible, but it is obvious over the last few years that corporate America, Europe etc are running things, and they have no consciences and I would not put them above preplanned acts of ruthlessness, and yes, terrorism (I'm sure THAT word will be flagged by the NSA). I'm not saying I agree with this analysis, but it sure makes you think. And I also noticed the completely contradictory reports coming out - that make me suspicious about the "news" coverage. There is also a lot of knee-jerk responses regarding assault rifles, lumping all semi-auto long arms into that category, so I guess that means shotguns and .22 rifles with semi-auto actions. Another "expert" was able to tell that an assault rifle was used because of the bullet wounds in the dead bodies, when it was the type of ammo used, that could be used in a regular single shot rifle..all designed to promote a ban. I'm not necessarily against an assault rifle ban, but let's at least use factual arguments.

Paragraphs can be your fried too.

I here tell folks saw black helicopters near the school minutes before the shooting.

Dear Lord...

A planned event to get a treaty signed?
That is as believable as 9/11 being planned by George Bush.
Or Chemtrails in the air to control the weather / the people.

You're relying on large groups of people planning and executing complex plans without messing up, and without somehow evidnece getting out. And this with a government that is uncapable of doing anything else efficiently or secretly.

Could have been the same ninjas that were in Ross Perot's yard that dark night ? Could have been those actors who simulated the moon landing out in New Mexico by thebigspendur's house. He saw the whole thing but was sworn to secrecy because he worked for the government. I'm risking my life by making this known but I can't stand the pressure anymore.

Originally Posted by Bruno

Dear Lord...

A planned event to get a treaty signed?
That is as believable as 9/11 being planned by George Bush.
Or Chemtrails in the air to control the weather / the people.

You're relying on large groups of people planning and executing complex plans without messing up, and without somehow evidnece getting out. And this with a government that is uncapable of doing anything else efficiently or secretly.

You do realize that there are people that absolutely believe that,, in fact many that sit far over in the left pasture...

There are as many Left Nutters as Right Nutters in fact if the media is to be believed there are way more Left Nutters in the US..

Basically if you believe that Bush lied about the Weapons of Mass Destrustion to get us into Iraq, then how hard is it to believe the somebody is lying to get us to sign a treaty

Just saying here not that I am a believer