Results 1 to 10 of 141
Hybrid View
-
12-20-2012, 06:29 AM #1
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- Seattle,WA.
- Posts
- 579
Thanked: 55The problem with this issue is that it appears to be a hot button issue for many so there is generally not a lot of open-minded conversation on this subject.
I have yet to hear the honest, law abiding, gun owners screaming for more restrictive legislation by distorting facts.
That's a rather skewed statement that's hard to address. I mentioned nothing about anyone screaming or distorting facts. There's a lot of misdirecting however or talking about subjects that aren't germane.
It is possible to own a gun and not have the same point of view as everyone else who owns a gun. My viewpoint isn't primarily shaped around the fact that I own a gun.
There's plenty of slogans but less substance.
Those wanting change are using arguments with no substance and completely ignoring the fact there are hundreds of laws forbidding the very activities they use to further their agenda of control.
Everyone at least open to change aren't of one mind. Most people realize that laws are currently being broken by criminals as that is very obvious.
It's not the point however in being open to consider if all our laws concerning guns are optimal. I agree that jumping on gun control as a magic bullet for every school shooting is also missing the point.
Gun control isn't (as has been rightly pointed out) the only issue that should be coming out of the recent school shouting however it is a reasonable subject to discuss.
Entirely too much shouting about a shooting. Despicable and tragic as it was, that punk could have accomplished the same thing with a lever action or a single stack pistol.
Sure, it's possible that he could or it may be that he could not. If he truly was a punk and not an expert marksman it's possible that he wouldn't have been able to kill so many without being stopped. We'll never know.
It is reasonable to at least ask, discuss, consider whether smaller magazines, slower methods of firing and certain limitations on use and ownership might be appropriate.
Why? How much time does it take to swap out a magazine? Answer, very little. Have you ever seen anybody that is proficient with a bolt action? No? Here ya go.
It doesn't take long but it does take some time and not every criminal is proficient. There's also very little reason for those things in the first place (by that same logic)
Most other countries mentioned as having lots of guns and low violence (involving guns) generally have many more restrictions than the people mentioning these realizes.
OK, so what. In Iraq, every family is allowed an AK-47, the real deal, the full auto like is illegal to own here without a CLASS III permit, for home protection.
OK, so whatAre we trying to pattern our way of living after Iraq
Quotes by Jefferson are revered mainly because he is saying what the person quoting wants to hear. If another founding father believed in high taxes or for guns to be locked up except upon invasion or whatever they wouldn't be quoted nearly as often.
Probably because the founding fathers had just fought a bloody war against an oppressive government and taxation without representation. A war that relied on the personal arms of soldiers early on. Those men provided their own weapons and ammo.
Exactly. That's hardly the situation we face today.
Most of the restrictions being talked about now and in the past (in my limited knowledge) would affect someone protecting against an intruder into their home nor would it have much to do with how a hunter uses his guns.
What part of the 2nd Amendment applies to hunting?
I didn't say anything about the 2nd Amendment specifically. The 2nd Amendment is hardly a clear document however. Much of the interest in guns however comes from hunters and therefore the mention.
Until the current "craze" is over I'm sure it would be a good idea for at least a few guns to be in a school (principal, some teachers) but I'm guessing a better long-term solution to this and the gun violence in the U.S. in general would be to be able to consider some limitations without it turning into a bigger deal than it is by pushing peoples "hot-buttons".
I agree. The bigger problem is for making people to take responsibility for their actions and be held accountable. Less medication of these kids and maybe some serious butt busting when they step over the line. People HAVE to know where their fences are. In my opinion, raising a child and raising a dog should be similar with respect to the fact that NO means NO. Once that concept is instilled, the rest is fairly easy to bring into line.
Dogs are generally easier to control than people and while popular to say I'm not sure in specific cases it's a good idea to reduce the drugs of kids who may be prone to turn an elementary school into a shooting gallery.
Of course drugs shouldn't be the first choice and I'm quite sure that they aren't in reality.Last edited by gcbryan; 12-20-2012 at 06:33 AM.
-
12-20-2012, 03:27 PM #2
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Republica de Tejas
- Posts
- 2,792
Thanked: 884As for doping these kids? I've no idea how old you are. As I've stated before, I'm 60.
My generation grew up with prayer in schools, teachers with a right and expectation to paddle those of us that stepped out of line, (my ass was busted on a LOT of occasions at school and worse when I got home). I'd never heard of a kid with cancer or autism until I was 20 years old. I probably had ADD. I dealt with it as did my teachers. Autism is close to one in fifty now. Child cancer and diabetes are through the roof in this country. Drugs like PROZAC are known and documented to cause problems ESPECIALLY if the medication is stopped. That is a fact.
The last two shootings of this type involved kids/young men who had been medicated with psychotropic drugs.
Exactly. That's hardly the situation we face today.
Our representative democracy is no longer representing the will of the people but rather special interest groups with big money. This country has problems and I think a lot of those problems are spilling out.
Parents have few rights to discipline their children compared to when I was young and teachers have none. It's fashionable to place the blame on a problem person EVERYWHERE but where but where it ultimately should reside.
It is possible to buy a street legal car that can go 250MPH. I know of no place on the planet that has 250MPH speed limit. Montana maybe, but if you crack it up because you couldn't control it, you will pay the piper. I haven't seen any legislation to the effect to limit production of those vehicles. The amount of ammunition that a gun can hold is irrelevant in my mind. As I've stated before (and there are many instances to support this,the school house bombing in Bath, Michigan in 1927 is but one example) a determined individual can and will accomplish his chosen mission with whatever is available.Member Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club, participant SE Asia War Games 1972-1973. The oath I swore has no statute of limitation.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Wullie For This Useful Post:
Nightblade (12-24-2012)
-
12-20-2012, 05:15 PM #3
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 96
Thanked: 12Wullie,
I come from a more recent generation, I had never prayed in school and am an "atheist" (save that for another debate).
Coming from the generation that will be assuming power in this nation in the next 20 years. I am disgusted at the culture that this nation has bread in regards to responsibility. It is so easy to say its not your fault and pass the buck, its done in politics on T.V. and every where our children look so why not follow that trend.
As for this tragedy one of the things that is the least talked about in this corrupt news media system that we have is the fact of his mental illness. They act as if he had access to these firearms the whole time. No he murdered his mother to take them, I don't think that is the firearms fault. I believe that everyone should try and look at this from another angle and that is that this nation is a pro-gun nation if we accept that for a moment and think of solutions with that being a constant. One solution that comes to mind is getting rid of these "victim zones"(better known as gun free zones), these zones are obviously easy targets as there is not fear for the perp..
Also I know this is firing blind but wouldn't you think if the brady's are so afraid of gun violence they might carry to protect themselves.. Its a proven fact that only laws effect law abiding citizens so why wouldn't they want to protect themselves from criminals. Just saying.
On a closing note. The only thing I think we can do to influence this decision is to write our legislators and inform them that this is a misguided reaction to something terrible and also enlighten them on the difference between an assault weapon and the semi-auto sporting rifle that the AR-15 and citizen available version of the AK-47 is.Down there between your legs, it is like an entertainment complex in the middle of the sewage system. Who designed that?
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Endofab For This Useful Post:
Wullie (12-20-2012)
-
12-20-2012, 05:26 PM #4
yes, it's possible to buy a car that will go 250mph and is legal however neither you or I or 99% of the population could afford to buy one. Even if we bought a used one we couldn't afford the maint and insurance. People can always build a bomb or crash an airplane or find some other inventive way to do mayhem but using these means is way more involved and difficult and there is way more of a chance you will be found out before you can accomplish your aim. Buying a few guns and some body armor and ammo is something anyone with a credit card can do in minutes and in a few days you can just walk into a mall and start firing away.
No matter how many men you kill you can't kill your successor-Emperor Nero
-
12-20-2012, 05:48 PM #5
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,069
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13249
Deer hunting after the Anointed one gets finished with our gun rights
-
12-24-2012, 06:57 AM #6
-
12-20-2012, 06:26 PM #7
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- Republica de Tejas
- Posts
- 2,792
Thanked: 884I figured somebody would bring up price when I typed that. By the way, have you seen what high capacity magazine prices have done in the last 72 hours?
I think Endofab is right on the mark about "victim Zones".
Take a peek at this page;
Top 10 Myths About Mass Shootings - The Conversation - The Chronicle of Higher Education
And at THE PLAN from the POTUS.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/multi...830&height=800
I wonder why mental health is at the bottom of the list.Member Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club, participant SE Asia War Games 1972-1973. The oath I swore has no statute of limitation.