Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38
  1. #21
    Loudmouth FiReSTaRT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Etobicoke, ON
    Posts
    7,171
    Thanked: 64

    Default

    Alex, I wasn't trying to be arrogant. Privilege is something you're supposed to earn and that can be taken away at any time. Right is something you have because you're living and breathing. I was just giving you a good-intentioned correction and nothing else. Sorry if I came off that way.
    We both agree that we're not treating the planet right. Our point of contention is whether the global population contributes to it. I believe it does and that we should adopt a dual approach. It doesn't look like either one of us will be able to convince the other, so let's agree to disagree

  2. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    66
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    "The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. At this late date nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate..."

    Nice quote from "The Population Bomb" by Paul R. Ehrlich.

    The real looming population problems are more akin to the Clash of Civilization type as Europe grays and continues to import its workers from cultures at odds with its own. How many cars burned in France on New Year's Day? China also has set itself up for an interesting future with the wildly distored male/female ratio brought about by its opressive one child laws.

  3. #23
    Vlad the Impaler LX_Emergency's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oss, the Netherlands
    Posts
    2,854
    Thanked: 223

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FiReSTaRT View Post
    Alex, I wasn't trying to be arrogant. Privilege is something you're supposed to earn and that can be taken away at any time. Right is something you have because you're living and breathing. I was just giving you a good-intentioned correction and nothing else. Sorry if I came off that way.
    We both agree that we're not treating the planet right. Our point of contention is whether the global population contributes to it. I believe it does and that we should adopt a dual approach. It doesn't look like either one of us will be able to convince the other, so let's agree to disagree
    I misunderstood Ilja. I used the word priviledge because I believe it's one we recieve from God. Sorry, I tend to let my religion influence my speak.

    We're understanding each other perfectly then. I didn't think you'd be that arrogant so I was kind of surprised. My apologies for that.

  4. #24
    Senior Member blabbermouth rtaylor61's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    2,376
    Thanked: 2

    Default

    Ilija,

    Having children is a privilege. Not everyone is able to have children, and not everyone is able to adopt. A right is something you are able to exercise. Not everyone can. Now, as far as limiting numbers, that is a personal choice, and is not what this thread is about. I have 5 children. We recycle. We turn off lights. My thermostat is set at 60f during the winter. We use public transportation when possible. I like to think we are doing our part.

    RT

  5. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    66
    Thanked: 0

    Default

    Technology and culture go a long way in determining environmental impact. Large parts of Eastern N. America were deforested back when charcoal was the fuel of choice and the population was a fraction of what it is today. Also, in the US, air and water quality have improved in the past 40 years while the population has increased.

  6. #26
    Loudmouth FiReSTaRT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Etobicoke, ON
    Posts
    7,171
    Thanked: 64

    Default

    Alex, no harm, no foul. I knew it was a misunderstanding.
    Randy, I was just trying to clarify Alex' point of view and not making a statement about having children being a right. I don't want to define it as either. I'd rather define it as a responsibility to the children and to the society.

  7. #27
    No Blood, No Glory TomlinAS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Right now...Al Asad, Iraq
    Posts
    175
    Thanked: 2

    Default

    RT - 60f? Brrr! Of course, in a home with 5 kids, a few degrees of difference can probably make a much bigger difference on the ole' heating bill than in my 2-br apartment, heh. I can definitely stand to use less A/C in the summer because I like the heat, but I really hate being cold, so I'm going to have to stay at 72 until the ice caps melt. :P

    The community garden is a really good idea! We had one in the community I lived in a few years back when I was in college, but I was busy drinking, attending parties and sometimes going to class, hehe. I'll have to see if we have one to contribute to in my area, as I doubt my landlord is going to let me dig in their yard. :/

    If you haven't read the book, I highly recommend it. Not only was it eye-opening on an environmental level, it was eye-opening on a political level...although talking with halliburton / KBR workers here kind of mitigated my surprise at some of the things I read.

  8. #28
    Senior Member blabbermouth rtaylor61's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    2,376
    Thanked: 2

    Default

    Sgt T,

    My kids either live with their mother or have flown the coop! But I do keep the thermo on 60! I also live in a 2 bdrm apt, and what makes it nice for me is I am on the middle floor, surrounded on 5 sides, and facing west. I get the afternoon/evening sun. The temp actually floats between 67-70 constantly. I can't remember the last time I heard the furnace kick on. When the kids come over, I might turn it up just a bit, but only if they complain!

    RT

  9. #29
    Honely Challenged drsch3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    392
    Thanked: 1

    Default

    I'm not passing any judgments on having, not having lots of kids or any kids, but there is a really interesting lecture on population and oil production that is really worth a look. It's pretty big and goes for about an hour.

    http://edison.ncssm.edu/programs/colloquia/bartlett.rm

    or here

    http://www.radnoesis.info/rnarchives...tts_lectur.php

    The guy talks about how over population is going to be a problem, you can argue when it is going to be a problem but eventually population growth will stop. He says nature will pick from a list of solutions such as war, disease, starvation, unless we do something first.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  10. #30
    < Banned User > Flanny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    [email protected] - I hone
    Posts
    904
    Thanked: 24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LX_Emergency View Post
    I misunderstood Ilja. I used the word priviledge because I believe it's one we recieve from God. Sorry, I tend to let my religion influence my speak.
    Don't apologize if it's an integral part of your life, dude. I get fed up with the world expecting people who believe in God to apologize (keyword here being "world" NOT "SRP members"). While I don't agree with the muslim faith I HIGHLY respect the followers' dedication to their God. Be proud of your faith man. Doesn't mean you have to shove it down everyone's throat (and I don't think you ever have here), but don't let the worlds loudly spoken agnst against it bully you into submission.

    If it's part of your character it's not religion, it's you.

    As for the overpopulation thing, GREED is more of a factor damaging the environment than people. Westerners think the world is a disposable resource (in general) and prove it by the average lifestyle. It's one of the effects of the disease of industrialized capitalism. But that's a hotly contested debate all by itself that I'll try not to digress with here.

    Yea I was trying to be humorous with my suggestions but It would really be cool if it were possible. I envy the amish of 30 years ago. Bikes and horses, candles and reusables, without intending to they really were doing a service for the environment. All that aside they led a hardworking, yet totally relaxed lifestyle.

    Glen F
    Last edited by Flanny; 01-06-2007 at 01:59 PM.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •