Originally Posted by
fpessanha
So I bumpped into this thread and I must say to all you kilt wearing dudes... Respect! :bow indeed.
I figure they are confortable and practical at times and, with a bit of attention, you won't be showing your assets all the time or even at all. BUT one question came to mind... I decided to search for kilts on google and a lot came up. Among the results, Utilikilts came up. Cool... nice site, nice kilts, nice philosophy! It is a manly thing, indeed. In fact... I never thought that a kilt would be anything other than manly. Think Braveheart and all that stuff.
BUT... isn't there a heritage issue in the whole thing? I mean... I read through most of the posts and you lot of kilt dudes sound like you have a Scott heeritage or Welsh or Irish or something kilt-culture-related. I mean... you are mostly americans or from the british isles. For the second ones, heritage is there - you are kilt legitimate.
The first group, the americans are... well americans, therefore, from the melting pot of cultural diversity. So I take it that there is also a legitimate heritage going there. You descend from Scotts or other kilt wearing people, right? I suppose that if you were italian-american you wouldn't be wearing kilts...
So, the question is: do you think you need to have some cultural heritage or ancestry to wear a kilt? I guess it 's just a garment - a confortable one - and the Utilikilts site makes you want one and stress out the fact that the sheer existence of the male genitalia and it's very peculiar phisionomy legitimate the kilt. Hey... I want one! But I am Portuguese... sure there were Celts in Portugal. Before the Romans... and after the romans Celtic heritage vanished. So... I guess I wouldn't feel culturaly confortable in a kilt... because I am not a Scott or from Celtic ancestry.
What do you think? Do you have to be scotish/welsh/irish to wear a Kilt?