Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25
Like Tree17Likes

Thread: Arkansas hardness

  1. #11
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default

    If you are trying to compare hardness, to performance between a hard Japanese natural and a hard Ark, thinking that harder is better or that it will produce a finer edge, it does not work that way.

    They are two very different stones that produce very different edges, for a lot of reasons. Performance of any natural, is mostly due to the hands doing the driving and the qualities of the stone itself, which are completely random.

    You can compare individual stones to each other, but hardness would only be one factor in performance, any more than you could say white cars are faster than red cars.
    jelajemi and Phrank like this.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Euclid440 For This Useful Post:

    jelajemi (05-18-2016)

  3. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,060
    Thanked: 246

    Default

    Arks (translucent and Black) are all pretty much the same "hardness" when speaking about the matrix of the stone and how tightly it's bound together - this is because the stones are almost pure silica, so nearly homogenous. The abrasive mix is almost identical in the high 90th percentile in every case, so the hardness of the abrasive itself is also fairly uniform and the same from stone to stone.

    JNats are much more heterogenous and composed of a wider mix of particulates, as well as being more or less dense than each other. This makes for a much wider spread of hardness in terms of how tenaciously the abrasive particles are held together in the matrix of the stone as well as some variability in the cutting power of those particles.

    As far as hardness (matrix-wise - the way that JNats are rated for hardness) of Arks vs. Jnats, I've only had double digits worth of JNats and the same of Arks, so can't say definitively, but the Arks are all harder than even the few JNats I've purchased as level "5+++," no question.
    jelajemi and Vasilis like this.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to eKretz For This Useful Post:

    jelajemi (05-18-2016)

  5. #13
    Member jelajemi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Elgin, Illinois. USA
    Posts
    95
    Thanked: 5

    Default

    Okay I better don't use my Translucent to raise some slurry. Thanks for the advice. I got another which I need to Id and going to take some pictures and maybe you and some of the other members can help me.

  6. #14
    Glock27
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    316
    Thanked: 18

    Default

    Mine are recently bought, soft, black and translucent. the acronyms LV-5 jnats is outside my realm of cognition. If you could explain it would be helpful. I go to antique shops for my razors, found a few stones that are weird and cannot find a respectable strop--they are all crapp-- and the dealters want outrageous prices for them. I had tussels with dealers over prices on blades. I picked up three brand spanking new german blades, decorated for $20 each. lovely pieces. The have Monday thrusday and Saturday on them so the other days are missing as I assume them came from a seven blade set.

  7. #15
    Glock27
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    316
    Thanked: 18

    Default

    I found, for me that the Japanese stones cut the steel faster than the Arkansas. I like them but it takes so long to prep them. I have gone to the Arkansas soft, black (used to sharpen surgeon scalpels) and the translucent, harder than the black, at least that is the way mine appear. The black has a touch more roughness to it than the translucent which is smooth as glass practically. I avoid the diamond. For me they remove too much metal too fast that I have no control. Belgium stones are far out of my range to touch, but wager they may be the best of all stones.

  8. #16
    Glock27
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    316
    Thanked: 18

    Default

    My opinion, but good luck getting any slurry on a translucent. That is on hell of a hard stone.

  9. #17
    Glock27
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    316
    Thanked: 18

    Default

    I have to take an exception to the opinion the black and translucent are all about the same. The ones I have are a world apart. The black has a slight texture to it and the translucent is slick as glass with oil.

  10. #18
    Glock27
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    316
    Thanked: 18

    Default

    It is my opinion until you have used them and paid close attention to the edge. The black and translucent take more work, but in the end, my opinion, they do a very fine job. I an touch the stones and feel the difference between them

  11. #19
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanked: 481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glock27 View Post
    I have to take an exception to the opinion the black and translucent are all about the same. The ones I have are a world apart. The black has a slight texture to it and the translucent is slick as glass with oil.
    All depends on where you get them from. You can find Black Arkansas stones that are hard, true hard (Same grade as Translucent), and True Black (Finest/highest grade possible). So if you got it cheap, or from a less than reputable seller, it may not be the grade it was advertised as. See here:

    Stone Grades 101
    Last edited by Marshal; 05-18-2016 at 09:55 PM.

  12. #20
    Glock27
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    316
    Thanked: 18

    Default

    Not arguing here. My black was $180 and the translucent was $220. Seller guaranteed quality stones. I can still feel the difference between the two stones. There are all kind of sites we just simply cannot verify. Until you take the stone to a gemologist would he be able to verify the authenticity. Might be a bad idea, but for me it would be too late.. The black was classified as the stone surgeon scalpels were sharpened on, as there are still scalpels out there that are one piece which surgeons prefer because of balance over the plastic snap in scalpels. I don't know who sharpens them though. No specific comments were made on the translucent except that it was a fininshing polish stone. the ones I have work quiet well for me and I have no argument except for the price I paid for them. Less expensive than the site you quoted. I am 71, retired special education teacher on a fixed income so paying big hundreds of dollars for stones is not for me. Any stone that puts a good edge on a blade which accomplishes a good shave is fine to use from my perspective regardless of the price paid..
    My grandfather never had these stones and honed his razor on a rotating wheel with a wather drip can. He sharpened everything on them. IT seemed to work for him. I think it is more how you approach the blade movement across the blade rather than the quality of the stone. Not this is my opinion. It is not intended to be an argument or disagreement. I am merely expressing my opinion. Even a black cheap stone could put a fine edge on a blade if it is approached with knowledge and experience. Sorry if I may have offended you on this, but it is my opinion as it is other members on this sight. Again I apologize if I made an unlikely intrusion into your realm of expertise. I have been doing this for at least 20 years or more, however, I am challenged by shaving around a beard.
    When I finish on my translucent I go to lapping paper, 1200, 8000. and 50,000 for my finish work then to the stroo. I use camellia oil from Japan on my blades after I shave. I have seven blades I use to take me though several weeks, maybe to shaves before I go to the strop. I powder my linine with a fine diatomaceous earth powder, food grade, then I leather it. That's me. Guess everyone has their own style of shaving. I don't believe it is that difficult of an art and I think some people try to elevate it to an are. The only art I can see is in the sharpening of the blade. Not the easiest task in the world to accomplist.
    I close with my apology again. Sorry.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •