Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25
Like Tree17Likes

Thread: Arkansas hardness

  1. #1
    Member jelajemi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Elgin, Illinois. USA
    Posts
    95
    Thanked: 5

    Default Arkansas hardness

    I have seen that natural japanese water stones are rated with a hardness number such as Lv2, Lv3, Lv 4 and Lv5. If we could rate a Translucent or a Black Arkansas, how hard could they be rated with this same scale? Thank you.

  2. #2
    illegitimum non carborundum Utopian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    11,544
    Thanked: 3795
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Eleven.

    And yes, here it is again...

    Name:  Spinal_Tap_-_Up_to_Eleven[1].jpg
Views: 266
Size:  31.4 KB

    Joking aside, I do think hard Arks are harder than hard Japanese hones.
    Vasilis likes this.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Utopian For This Useful Post:

    jelajemi (05-18-2016)

  4. #3
    Senior Member Iceni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Coventry
    Posts
    710
    Thanked: 221

    Default

    Problem with an ark is it's reliant on the burnish.

    Once you start to put slurry on them you have to be careful, If you go too low the burnish will just vanish and you have to start again.

    I've played with mine with slurry, and outside of the finest finishing slurries you have to pay attention. I've had some success with light coti and thuri slurries provided I build the slurry on a DTM and transfer it over. If I try to slurry on the rock my burnish generally doesn't fare so well. I once tried a 6K king slurry and the stone came off looking shot blasted.
    Real name, Blake

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Iceni For This Useful Post:

    jelajemi (05-18-2016)

  6. #4
    Glock27
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    316
    Thanked: 18

    Default

    I have a collection of stones, diamond, Japanese, Arkansas and Lapping film. I really love the lapping film for the very last finish. I prefer the Arkansas because they are less hassel than Japanese water stones. The have to soak so long. I have up to 15,000grit but the Arkansas I have soft, black and translucent. They do take a lot of work, slow and even control. I like the 3 inch because it covers most blades. Diamond I am not too fansey for as they seem to take of more than I want I have been doing this for 20 years and am still learning. Best Sharpening stores carry the lapping film. One sheet will cut three pieces and mounted on a flat, smooth surface it will service about 30 razors before having to change. if you have not tried them I would suggest that you give them a go. Be extra careful because you can cut them very easy.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Glock27 For This Useful Post:

    jelajemi (05-18-2016)

  8. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    143
    Thanked: 32

    Default

    LV-5+++ UP UP UP

    I have some pretty hard LV-5 jnats and none of them compare to the vintage Trans and blacks I've lapped.
    Vasilis and CrownCork like this.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Dcaddo1 For This Useful Post:

    jelajemi (05-18-2016)

  10. #6
    Tradesman s0litarys0ldier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Sault Sainte Marie
    Posts
    1,719
    Thanked: 245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcaddo1 View Post
    LV-5+++ UP UP UP

    I have some pretty hard LV-5 jnats and none of them compare to the vintage Trans and blacks I've lapped.
    ^ This

    LV-6

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to s0litarys0ldier For This Useful Post:

    jelajemi (05-18-2016)

  12. #7
    Member jelajemi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Elgin, Illinois. USA
    Posts
    95
    Thanked: 5

    Default

    Thanks everybody. I'll try raising some slurry on a translucent, to see what I get.

  13. #8
    illegitimum non carborundum Utopian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    11,544
    Thanked: 3795
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Glock27 View Post
    I prefer the Arkansas because they are less hassel than Japanese water stones. The have to soak so long. I have up to 15,000grit but the Arkansas I have soft, black and translucent.
    Japanese natural water stones, about which the OP asked, do not need to be soaked at all.
    Vasilis likes this.

  14. #9
    illegitimum non carborundum Utopian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    11,544
    Thanked: 3795
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iceni View Post
    Problem with an ark is it's reliant on the burnish.

    Once you start to put slurry on them you have to be careful, If you go too low the burnish will just vanish and you have to start again.

    I've played with mine with slurry, and outside of the finest finishing slurries you have to pay attention. I've had some success with light coti and thuri slurries provided I build the slurry on a DTM and transfer it over. If I try to slurry on the rock my burnish generally doesn't fare so well. I once tried a 6K king slurry and the stone came off looking shot blasted.
    Quote Originally Posted by jelajemi View Post
    Thanks everybody. I'll try raising some slurry on a translucent, to see what I get.
    For the reason Iceni gave, slurrying an Arkansas stone is not a great idea. If you do decide to experiment with it, realize you may have some work ahead of you to restore the surface of the Ark.
    jelajemi likes this.

  15. #10
    Preserver of old grinding methods hatzicho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    649
    Thanked: 1230

    Default

    The translucent Arks are as hard as quartzite, means the hardness is in a region of 7 according to the Mohs scale. For comparison Carborundum has a Mohs hardness of 9, diamond 10. The scale used with Jnats is not the Mohs scale, it is just a scale from soft to hard (1-5) if I recall correct. Don't know if it is somehow based on one of the scientific scales. But I have lappped several Jnats up to a lv5 and would rate them somehow according to Mohs with the number, considering that Thuringians are around Mohs 3.
    jelajemi likes this.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to hatzicho For This Useful Post:

    jelajemi (05-18-2016)

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •