Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37
Like Tree37Likes

Thread: Another whats under the stone post.

  1. #21
    Senior Member Steve56's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    1,837
    Thanked: 508
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    As for natural grit ratings, I understand and agree with the statements above with one caveat.

    Here's a thought for discussion: With respect to a given natural stone used by a knowledgeable person, you could ask them 'What grit synthetic would you replace it with in a progression?' And I believe you would get a good answer.

    Also, synthetics are not all the same grit either, there is some coarser and some finer grit in them too though the distribution is known and can be described.

    Cheers, Steve

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,060
    Thanked: 246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StewieS View Post
    EKretz; I am assuming you have limited knowledge of Salmen's background as an owner, major dealer and exporter of U.K mined natural sharpening stones. They were equivalent to Pikes from the USA.

    StewieS;
    Yes, I'm aware of that. However I hadn't heard that Salmen was also selling stones obtained from the Meikledale quarry.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,060
    Thanked: 246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve56 View Post
    As for natural grit ratings, I understand and agree with the statements above with one caveat.

    Here's a thought for discussion: With respect to a given natural stone used by a knowledgeable person, you could ask them 'What grit synthetic would you replace it with in a progression?' And I believe you would get a good answer.

    Also, synthetics are not all the same grit either, there is some coarser and some finer grit in them too though the distribution is known and can be described.

    Cheers, Steve
    That is true, but they at least are consistent hone to hone since the grit is screened/purposely sorted. I have seen natural stones that are purported to be "the same stone" vary quite a bit - since they are basically just grit/detritus deposited by Mother Nature, they aren't always very consistent. That was mostly the point I was getting at. Just because one person's natural stone is equivalent to "X" grit synth finisher doesn't mean they all will be, so it's difficult to give an accurate rating other than an approximate range.

  4. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    59
    Thanked: 20

    Default

    I have no intention of buying more honing stones. So that in itself will represent the end of my posts on nat stones. (you can breath easy now gents).

    StewieS;

  5. #25
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default

    I have no intention of buying more honing stones.”

    Said the exact same thing to my bride, just the other day…

    She laughed…
    rodb and Marshal like this.

  6. #26
    Senior Member kelbro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Carolina
    Posts
    1,352
    Thanked: 181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Euclid440 View Post
    I have no intention of buying more honing stones.”

    Said the exact same thing to my bride, just the other day…

    She laughed…
    I say that every week.

  7. #27
    Senior Member Kristian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Laasby, Denmark
    Posts
    288
    Thanked: 71

    Default

    Well all have stated fine views on natural hone grit. Only remaining point is how to rate a nat hone? The last resort, after trying the hone on tests razors, could be to lick the hone and thereby comparing it to a synthetic of similar grit. There are threads about it here and thou the method is weird, it does work and gives a good key to the hone grit.

    Just don't do it when the wife is at home. [emoji23]


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Steel likes this.

  8. #28
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanked: 481

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kristian View Post
    Well all have stated fine views on natural hone grit. Only remaining point is how to rate a nat hone? The last resort, after trying the hone on tests razors, could be to lick the hone and thereby comparing it to a synthetic of similar grit. There are threads about it here and thou the method is weird, it does work and gives a good key to the hone grit.

    Just don't do it when the wife is at home. [emoji23]


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Considering there's no telling what some of my old stones are liable to have in them, licking them is perhaps not the best idea. I don't want to know what hundred plus year old whale oil, honing oils that are older than I am, or the simple green I used to leech the oil out of the hones tastes like.

    I think I'll stick to honing a blade on the rocks, then examining the stria under a loupe and giving it my best guess.

  9. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    59
    Thanked: 20

    Default

    Marshal; do you honestly believe that whale oil was used.

    StewieS;

    Whale oil has low viscosity (lower than olive oil),[4] is clear, and varies in color from a bright honey yellow to a dark brown, according to the condition of the blubber from which it has been extracted and the refinement through which it went. It has a strong fishy odor. When hydrogenated, it turns solid and white and loses its unpleasant taste and odor.[5][6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whale_oil

  10. #30
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanked: 481

    Default

    Depending on the age of the stone? Without a doubt.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honing_oil

    There are many different kinds of "honing oils" to suit different needs. It is important to use the appropriate solution for the job. In the case of knife sharpening, motor oil is too thick or "heavy" and can over-lubricate or clog a sharpening stone, whereas WD-40 is too "light" an oil and will not carry the metal filings plus stone dust (collectively known as "swarf") away from the stone, and clog it. Not using any oil at all will also clog or "glaze" the stone, again reducing its cutting power.[5] Historically sperm whale oil, Neatsfoot oil, and other animal fats were popular.
    It wouldn't surprise me if a hundred plus year old Arkansas stone had seen some of all of the above. I've got a few that have been used with various motor oils, WD-40, Crisco, bacon fat, spit (with and without tobacco juice), corn and vegetable oil. And that's just what I saw my grandfather put on them in my life time.

    Edit/addendum:

    This is also why I balk when I see the suggestion of licking a stone.
    Last edited by Marshal; 12-12-2016 at 11:21 PM.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •