Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37
Like Tree37Likes

Thread: Another whats under the stone post.

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    59
    Thanked: 20

    Default Another whats under the stone post.

    Received this 2nd hand natural sharpening stone from the U.K this morning.

    Under all that old oil and grime there are features that indicate its most likely crystaline novaculite in structure, an oil stone, either Washita or Arkansas.



    The same stone after being flattened reveals much more of the stones natural features.



    During the flattening process, indications are, its a hard stone, slow slurry releasing, most likely pointing to its identity as being Arkansas.

    To validate that fact, requires some mathematics to work out the stones specific gravity. (SG)

    Weight of the stone = 515 grams.

    Mass ( 20.1 cm x 4.7cm x 2.3cm) = 217.28 cm3

    515/ 217.28 = 2.37 g/cm3

    SG = 2.37.

    Using the following site as a reference; http://www.danswhetstone.com/stone_grades_101.htm,

    It identifies the stone as being within the Hard Arkansas range of 2.30 - 2.45 SG / 800 - 1000 grit.

    StewieS;
    Last edited by StewieS; 12-01-2016 at 02:05 AM.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to StewieS For This Useful Post:

    Geezer (12-01-2016), ScoutHikerDad (12-10-2016), xiaotuzi (12-01-2016)

  3. #2
    Senior Member DoughBoy68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Crossville, TN
    Posts
    1,711
    Thanked: 304

    Default

    Should be an excellent finisher/polisher. I have a translucent Arkansas that I use occasionally after the Select Coticule for a little more polish and smoothness.
    ScoutHikerDad likes this.
    "If You Knew Half of What I Forgot You Would Be An Idiot" - by DoughBoy68

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    695
    Thanked: 77

    Default

    Washita

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

  5. #4
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default

    Give it a hose of Oven Cleaner, a scrubbing with a scotch brite and a Simple Green bath and you will have a very good idea of what it really is.

    If it’s an Ark, put a razor on it before you lap it, it may have a hundred-year old burnished finish on it, that will put a nice edge on a razor, who knows, next time...

    If you want to get all the oil out, Simple Green and water and a good soak, I have soaked Arks for up to a year, to get an old Lilly White pristine and clean smelling.

    Lately I have been using 99 Cent Store “Awsome” on some stones with better results than Simple Green for soaking. Glass Pasta jars with the clamp on lids and rubber gaskets, from the thrift store, work well to keep the air out, change the water and degreaser every couple weeks, until they stop releasing black oil.

    Nice find, should be a good bevel setter or tool hone.
    ScoutHikerDad and Marshal like this.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Euclid440 For This Useful Post:

    ScoutHikerDad (12-10-2016)

  7. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    59
    Thanked: 20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aaron1234 View Post
    Washita

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
    aaron; I am prepared to listen. Put forward your case that the stone is not an Ark, but a Washita.

    StewieS.
    aaron1234 likes this.

  8. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Rhode island
    Posts
    159
    Thanked: 16

    Default

    Also looks like many grimy washita stones that I have cleaned up. I'm not close to as knowledgeable as the folks here though.
    ScoutHikerDad likes this.

  9. #7
    Senior Member kelbro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    N. Carolina
    Posts
    1,352
    Thanked: 181

    Default

    I have a Washita that is similarly colored. Great stone for me.
    ScoutHikerDad likes this.

  10. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,060
    Thanked: 246

    Default

    Stewie may be right in this case. The volume (not mass, as he inadvertently labeled it) of the stone if it's a Hard Ark or Washita would be less than his calculated volume, because Hard Arks and Washitas are somewhat porous (not to mention any missing volume due to chamfers, corner rounding etc). Less volume means the density would actually be slightly higher than his calculated density. Thusly it would pretty much have to be a Hard Ark if it's really from the Ark family of stones.
    Last edited by eKretz; 12-02-2016 at 03:05 AM.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to eKretz For This Useful Post:

    StewieS (12-02-2016)

  12. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    59
    Thanked: 20

    Default

    Had the opportunity to test this stone out to form a secondary bevel on 1 of my workshop chisels. The stone itself retained a good level of oil on the top surface of the stone, and there was no need to add further oil while working the stone. Fairly impressive given its a rather hot day outside, and a few degrees hotter within the workshop. The stone is a very slow release stone, with little sign of slurry release. The top surface of the stone is what I classify as hard to very hard. As noted within my opening post, using the ANSI Standard, based it suggests the range of grit at 800 - 1000. I have some slight concerns with how the ANSI and JSI Standards vary greatly from that being stated by a lot of natural stone suppliers. Japanese nat stones being a relevant example. Based on what is being declared by these Japanese nat stone suppliers, I would rate this stone equivalent to 8000 grit. This is to large extent based on the level of sheen left on the steel after being worked by the stone. The finer the scratches, the higher the grit, the change in sheen to reflective shine. Some alloy steels such as A2 and PM may vary slightly from this principle. Moving on to the photo's, the 1st photo shows the secondary bevel after being worked by the stone. The 2nd photo shows both the primary and secondary bevels after a dozen strokes on the pure chromium oxide impregnated leather stropping block. The end result is a very sharp cutting edge.

    regards StewieS;



    Last edited by StewieS; 12-02-2016 at 04:38 AM.

  13. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    59
    Thanked: 20

    Default

    Of interest, if I were to reduce the total weight of this stone by 25g (4.8% of its current weight), it would still be borderline high of a Washita's range of SG. (2.25 or under)

    StewieS;
    Last edited by StewieS; 12-02-2016 at 11:11 PM.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •