Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 123
Like Tree116Likes

Thread: Tsushima "Ocean Blue" 12K

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    1,100
    Thanked: 292

    Default

    Many of the standard productions razors like Dovo and Boker have a edge length of about 70mm, about 2 3/4". However, there are some razors that are close to 3" and having a 2.7" wide hone is helpful. I am not sure that going to a 3.2" wide hone is necessary for a razor, although it might be useful on a chefs knife. Since I am using it for razors, I purchased the 8" x 2.7" size.

    I know that some people have even tried honing on Nagura size stones, but it seems to me that your technique would have to be spot on to keep uniform pressure across the width of the blade on that small a stone. It is a little easier with a stone whose width is close to the length of the blade.

  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,060
    Thanked: 246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal View Post
    Large stone dimensions: 8.0 x 2.7 x 1.0 Total Volume: 21.6
    XLarge stone dimensions: 8.0 x 3.2 x 1.1 Total volume: 28.16

    Large stone $4.03 per cubic inch
    XLarge stone $4.43 per cubic inch
    I'm still not sure what the heck the sizes are. If you look in different places, they give two different dimensions for both stones. For the 'L' size one size given is 2.7" x 8" x 1" and in another place it says 2.7" x 8" x 1.2" and 950g weight. For the larger size one (XL) one size given is 3.2" x 8" x 20mm (.79") and 900g weight and the other is 3.2" x 8" x 1.1" so who knows!

    Edit: that was yesterday - it now appears that they have edited the description of the 'XL' stone now so it is 3.2" x 8" x 1.1" and 1250g. The 'L' stone still has two sizes given in the listing varying in thickness.
    Last edited by eKretz; 01-29-2017 at 09:39 AM.

  3. #33
    Senior Member blabbermouth Kees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,474
    Thanked: 656

    Default

    These are natural stones so no 2 are identical. There may be more than one vein or stratum under the ocean. Every one having its own characteristics. Petty amazing they extract hones below the ocean floor.
    Here's some more info on the names and colours of the stones: Tsushima Black Nagura | TomoNagura.Com | Keith V. Johnson

    As with all natural stones: you need to get the from a knowledgeable seller who can recoomend a stone that suits your purpose.
    Last edited by Kees; 01-29-2017 at 09:05 AM.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.

  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    1,100
    Thanked: 292

    Default

    Any natural quarry can contain stones of different quality. The Belgium quarry that yields yellow Coticules also yields Belgium Blue, two stones that are different and serve different purposes. Sometimes the layers are adjacent so that they can produce a yellow Coticule backed by a Belgium Blue without using an adhesive between them; unusual, but they do exist.

  5. #35
    Modine MODINE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Lee's Summit, Missouri- (KC)
    Posts
    1,442
    Thanked: 731

    Default

    Here are Tsushima stones. The big one is a "Sea" stone from So Yamashita. The smaller one is a "Mountain" stone from Dr. Naka.
    Both exhibit similar mid range performance characteristics.
    Mike




  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MODINE For This Useful Post:

    Euclid440 (01-29-2017), Srdjan (01-29-2017), Steve56 (01-30-2017), tinkersd (01-29-2017)

  7. #36
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default

    Yea, this is not the traditional Tsushima stone. It does appear to be a different stone, possibly of a different grit range and composition.

    Not saying it is not a finisher, just that it is not the same stone.

    We have seen this before, with folks labeling stones with the names of traditional stone.

    They may be mined from Tsushima, but not from traditional sources.

    The one plus is/are the Ortiz videos, he does appear to be knowledgeable and has posted, a lot of natural stone honing videos in the last year or so…

    If you want to compare grit stria, Alex Gilmore at



    The Japan Stone, has several very good videos comparing stria to know grits. Hard Japanese naturals usually produce a kasumi, hazy finish that cannot be compared conclusively.

    Time, use and results, by others will tell.

    Pay your money and take your chances, there are no magic stone…
    Srdjan likes this.

  8. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,060
    Thanked: 246

    Default

    Hey, there's the first natural stone I found in the wild! Brings back memories, lol.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to eKretz For This Useful Post:

    Srdjan (01-30-2017)

  10. #38
    Junior Tinkerer Srdjan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    799
    Thanked: 242

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eKretz View Post
    Hey, there's the first natural stone I found in the wild! Brings back memories, lol.
    That's very cool!
    As the time passes, so we learn.

  11. #39
    The First Cut is the Deepest! Magpie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Upper Middle Slobovia NY
    Posts
    2,736
    Thanked: 480

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eKretz View Post
    I'm still not sure what the heck the sizes are. If you look in different places, they give two different dimensions for both stones. For the 'L' size one size given is 2.7" x 8" x 1" and in another place it says 2.7" x 8" x 1.2" and 950g weight. For the larger size one (XL) one size given is 3.2" x 8" x 20mm (.79") and 900g weight and the other is 3.2" x 8" x 1.1" so who knows!

    Edit: that was yesterday - it now appears that they have edited the description of the 'XL' stone now so it is 3.2" x 8" x 1.1" and 1250g. The 'L' stone still has two sizes given in the listing varying in thickness.
    When I wrote my comment, the XL stone was listed at .8 thickness, and weighing in at 50gm LESS than the L stone.

  12. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    1,100
    Thanked: 292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Magpie View Post
    When I wrote my comment, the XL stone was listed at .8 thickness, and weighing in at 50gm LESS than the L stone.
    The large ocean blue stone I purchased was 7 3/4" L x 2 11/16" W x 15/16" thick with all measurements to 1/16". The weight was 949g.

Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •