Results 1 to 10 of 12
Thread: Hone identification
-
03-01-2017, 05:06 PM #1
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 19
Thanked: 0Hone identification
Hi, I have acquired what I feel is a very interesting stone. I have seen one other like it for sale on the Bay but I can't seem to find any info on these. It is black with a very sparkly/glittery surface. One side has what I'd guess to be the original owners name scratched in the surface that appears natural. It's a very fine and very dense hone I fact I'd say almost Arkansas dense but not nearly that hard. To me I am just happy to have this piece of history and to have the chance to share it but I would love to know more. I figured since I have seen a couple that maybe some of you may know something. I am posting pictures dry, wet, slurry, etc. thanks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
03-01-2017, 06:40 PM #2
Clearly looks like a slate - but impossible to say which origin.
Thanks for posting!
-
03-01-2017, 08:22 PM #3
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- NW Indiana
- Posts
- 1,060
Thanked: 246No way to say for sure, as Peter mentioned, but I do have a labeled Silkstone that shares the same naturally formed bottom. The other characteristics fit also (slight sparkles, slurry color). Silkstones are very high density - they "ping" when tapped with something like a hard screwdriver handle or razor spine at a very high pitch (not quite at Arkansas level but pretty high) to give you another check. So it is possible that you may have a Silkstone, but by no means positive.
Last edited by eKretz; 03-01-2017 at 08:25 PM.
-
03-01-2017, 08:37 PM #4
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- NW Indiana
- Posts
- 1,060
Thanked: 246Here are my two Silkstones, both labeled examples. A couple other characteristics are the slightly mottled surface pattern and the distinctive sawcuts. (I've seen examples with and without visible sawcuts though - some must have been flattened/smoothed). These are both 8" x 2" x 1".
-
03-02-2017, 06:04 PM #5
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 19
Thanked: 0I am so thankful for the help guys! I am certain after som research that I in fact have a silk stone. 100% on par with all the characteristics I have found! You guys are the best! Thanks again
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
03-02-2017, 06:24 PM #6
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 19
Thanked: 0So what I am seeing in past discussions is that silk stones are a decent finisher. Not as smooth as a thuringian, though comparable but more on par with a woa hone? My first instinct was to try it as a pre finisher after 8k then one of my Escher/thuringian hones? I know you both have experimented with silk stones can you guys give me your input on them? Thanks again
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
03-02-2017, 06:44 PM #7
Hi James,
so I am not certain that your stone is indeed a Silkstone. I do have 3 or 4 Silkstones in my collection but non of them show these glittering sparks. These are either larger particles of quarzite or iron oxide/sulfite. At least the Silkstones I have do not show any sparks like yours.
-
03-02-2017, 07:26 PM #8
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 19
Thanked: 0
-
03-02-2017, 09:26 PM #9
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Location
- NYC, NY
- Posts
- 1,496
Thanked: 169You haven't tried it yet? Give it a go and see what it acts like
-
03-02-2017, 09:47 PM #10
Mine shows sparkle, but it was never proved to be a silkstone. The card sleeve had no readable writing, but looked very similar to the cambrock sleeves. Think it's an 8" x 2" x 0.5" stone from memory.
The Sparkle is really hard to photograph, There is actually far more than the images show.
As for using it, I find mine doesn't give great edges. The 8K superstone is superior.
Last edited by Iceni; 03-02-2017 at 09:51 PM.
Real name, Blake