Results 1 to 10 of 21
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Dan's Whetstone True Hard

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,110
    Thanked: 458

    Default

    (I can hone a razor on a pike washita, by the way, so the concern here has nothing to do with honing razors, they should all easily be fine enough with a properly conditioned surface).
    Steel and outback like this.

  2. #2
    Skeptical Member Gasman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    10,486
    Thanked: 2186

    Default

    Learning a bit here. Thanks for sharing all this info. Question, the soft is not the same as the black or thrans right? Its a different animal?
    It's just Sharpening, right?
    Jerry...

  3. #3
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,110
    Thanked: 458

    Default

    The soft is a stone with lower density and more pores than anything we're discussing above. It's a faster cutter and less fine.

    The hard that dan's sells is between the three truly hard stones mentioned above, but I'm sure you could hone a razor with one that was settled in, especially if you have a good linen and strop.
    JeffR, Marshal and Gasman like this.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to DaveW For This Useful Post:

    Gasman (08-09-2017)

  5. #4
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanked: 481

    Default

    DaveW beat me to it. All types are same material. Soft has most pores and lowest density. Hard is in the middle. Then we have True Hard/Translucent/Surgical Black with the least amount of pores and highest density. It's all Novaculite, but the larger pores make a soft stone much more aggressive and fast cutting.
    JeffR and ScoutHikerDad like this.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Marshal For This Useful Post:

    Gasman (08-09-2017)

  7. #5
    Skeptical Member Gasman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    10,486
    Thanked: 2186

    Default

    Thanks for the explanations. Now I might be pushing my luck but here goes, And sorry to the OP for the question, What is the difference between one of these and a Thuringian if they are both very hard and are rated about the same if you were to think in grits? I know, No grit sizes when talking naturals. Just trying to get a grasp on this all.
    It's just Sharpening, right?
    Jerry...

  8. #6
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanked: 481

    Default

    Thuringian is slate, thus more analogous to Welsh or Vermont slates than Arkansas stones.

    Thuringian waterwhetstones are slate stones or more precisely mud slate. These slates
    consist of quartz – which is the abrasive material, clay, mica (glimmer) and chlorite.
    The soft waterwhetstones were found in upper-Devonian age deposits.
    Pulled from:

    http://strazors.com/uploads/images/articles/escher.pdf
    jfk742 likes this.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Marshal For This Useful Post:

    Gasman (08-10-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •