Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
Like Tree8Likes

Thread: Naniwa 400 clarification

  1. #1
    Sardaukar salazch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    444
    Thanked: 57

    Default Naniwa 400 clarification

    I'm looking at some Naniwa 400 grit stones and it looks like there are two different kinds. One is a Naniwa Chosera 400 and the other is a Naniwa Super 400. The Super is around $20-$30 less than the other stone on most sites.

    For reference I'll post links to the two stones here if it helps.
    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003V3PLMU...iglink20401-20

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/172919896673?rmvSB=true

    Aside from the color and thickness differences, do you think they are the same stone or same quality?

    Thanks guys.

  2. #2
    Senior Member blabbermouth bluesman7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Denver CO
    Posts
    4,617
    Thanked: 811

    Default

    They are very different. The Chosera [pro] has a mineral type binder and the feel of a stone. The Superstone [sharpening series, or SP] has a resin binder and feels kind of like plastic. Are you sure that you need a 400? A 600 is plenty coarse for rough razor work IMO.

  3. #3
    Sardaukar salazch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    444
    Thanked: 57

    Default

    Thanks for the info, that helps.
    I'll probably go with a 600 for my razor restoration work. I like having something for removing lots of metal from knives so I don't have to use a diamond stone, and I was thinking of a 400 for knife work so I don't have to use my straight razor hones for that kind of work. My new hobby is restoring old knives. Think a 600 would work for that too?
    RusenBG likes this.

  4. #4
    rhensley rhensley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    West TN.
    Posts
    2,155
    Thanked: 243

    Default

    I have a naniwa SP400 green hone . I find it a little to aggresive for me and what I do. I guess it's for those times when you need to get a big chip out of a blade.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Vasilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    885
    Thanked: 202

    Default

    For serious restoration I'm going as low as the Suehiro 320 (it's actually quite finer though, just for reference) with layers of tape on spine.
    Or I might use something in the 800 grit.
    With or without slurry.
    It depends on how bad the bevel is, how much metal you want to remove, and in each case you make the appropriate choice. Unfortunately, it requires experience so that you won't remove too much metal, or end up using a far too fine stone and take a week for a single razor, the right stone for the minimal metal removal until the edge is restored "to perfection".

    As for the stones, the chocera-professional I think they are called now, is a faster and longer lasting stone. The ceramic binder has some disadvantages, but performance-wise, most of us would agree that it's better. Hence the higher price.
    Not that the classic/cheaper naniwa is a bad choice, both lines from the company have earned our respect.
    onimaru55 likes this.

  6. #6
    Senior Member blabbermouth bluesman7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Denver CO
    Posts
    4,617
    Thanked: 811

    Default

    A 600 could work for knives, of course it would be slower than a lower grit for material removal. I've been using a Crystilon for material removal and finishing on a hard Washita for my knives lately. The Chosera or Pro series will be much better than the Sharpening Series for knives IMO, as they are much harder.
    gssixgun and outback like this.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Chicago Suburbs
    Posts
    1,098
    Thanked: 292

    Default

    Since your objective is to remove a lot of metal quickly when restoring knives, you might consider using various grits of Silicon Carbide wet/dry sandpaper. Get a piece of glass or granite to use as a backer for the paper.

    Since SiC is harder than most other abrasives except Cubic Boron Nitride and diamond, it works quickly. It also has a particle shape that is great for metal removal.

    I have the 400 grit Superstone. I have only used it when I had to remove a bad chip in the toe of a vintage razor. For razors, normally 1000 grit is as course as needed.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Vasilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    885
    Thanked: 202

    Default

    Sandpaper CAN be used, but it wears down quickly, when new a "1000 grit" piece cuts way too aggressively for 1000 grit and 2' later it gets quite finer and slower' too slow.
    If it's the first time trying it on a tool that is of some worth and don't want some extra wear or scratches, I would advice against it.
    If not, go for it. Although any coarse (from 400 grit or below, like the stone you mentioned that would perform consistently) sandpaper is way too coarse for honing any delicate tool, and in the long run, too expensive. Let alone that you need a flat surface, there is a chance it will deform depending the brand and you might ending up damaging the edge further instead of improving it.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Steve56's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    1,838
    Thanked: 509
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Do yourself a favor and get the double thick Shapton Glass HR 500. It's considerably faster than either a 320 Shapton Pro or a 600 Chosera (I have both), and it's about the same fineness as the 600 Chosera. It will cut anything and the speed is nice when dealing with chips and geometry issues.

    Cheers, Steve
    Last edited by Steve56; 02-27-2018 at 03:44 AM.

  10. #10
    Sardaukar salazch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Salt Lake City, Utah
    Posts
    444
    Thanked: 57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve56 View Post
    Do yourself a favor and get the double thick Shapton Glass HR 500. It's considerably faster than either a 320 Shapton Pro or a 600 Chosera (I have both), and it's about the same fineness as the 600 Chosera. It will cut anything and the speed is nice when dealing with chips and geometry issues.

    Cheers, Steve
    How long do those stones last?
    Vasilis likes this.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •