Thread: PSA, Shapton Glass 1k

If you want a nice traveling touch up razor hone, you’d be hard pressed to find one better than the 0.85u (about 16k) Glass G7. Note, the 0.44u is not recommended for razors per my conversation with Mark at CKTG’s conversation with Ishida San at Shapton. The ‘7’ stands for 7mm, so the abrasive is thicker than the regular bench size line (5mm).

Man, it's frustrating when the .com and .ca sites don't get on the same page with a sale. Ah well. Saved me buying another hone I don't *really* need.

Thanks for the heads-up though.

1. It is still on sale in Canada
2. Thank you Steve for letting us know
2. I hate you Steve for letting us know
4. I got the 25 and 11.5 micron
5. Did I mention I hate you Steve?

Originally Posted by AlanQ

1. It is still on sale in Canada

The "7" is on sale up here north of the border, but unfortunately (or in my case fortunately!) not the full-size one.

Originally Posted by Cangooner

The "7" is on sale up here north of the border, but unfortunately (or in my case fortunately!) not the full-size one.

I still got it You are more fortunate than I in that you have better impulse control

Originally Posted by AlanQ

I still got it You are more fortunate than I in that you have better impulse control

Now there's something I don't hear very often!!

Congrats on a good buy - it should serve you well.

Bastards now have strops on sale but jokes on them im now broke
https://www.fendrihan.ca/collections...-hanging-strop

Originally Posted by Steve56

If you want a nice traveling touch up razor hone, you’d be hard pressed to find one better than the 0.85u (about 16k) Glass G7. Note, the 0.44u is not recommended for razors per my conversation with Mark at CKTG’s conversation with Ishida San at Shapton. The ‘7’ stands for 7mm, so the abrasive is thicker than the regular bench size line (5mm).

I beg to differ. The 0.44u that I bought works great on razors.

Originally Posted by kelbro

I beg to differ. The 0.44u that I bought works great on razors.

I had the 0.44 and unfortunately it was defective - it shed large particles. I returned it to the vendor, Mark at CKTG who returned it to Ishida San at Shapton. When asked about the replacement, Ishida San said that the 0.44 was not recommended for razors and I didn’t need it because I had the 0.85. Apparently, although the average grit size is 0.44, it has some larger grit in it than the 0.85.

This is apparently why some of the HR and HC series Glass stones are not recommended for razors. That chart from Jende showing this has been posted recently.

Having said all that, people are using Glass Stones that aren't recommended for razors with good results, including me, but what Mark told me was enlightening.

Ask him and see what he says.

Originally Posted by Steve56

I had the 0.44 and unfortunately it was defective - it shed large particles. I returned it to the vendor, Mark at CKTG who returned it to Ishida San at Shapton. When asked about the replacement, Ishida San said that the 0.44 was not recommended for razors and I didn’t need it because I had the 0.85. Apparently, although the average grit size is 0.44, it has some larger grit in it than the 0.85.

This is apparently why some of the HR and HC series Glass stones are not recommended for razors. That chart from Jende showing this has been posted recently.

Having said all that, people are using Glass Stones that aren't recommended for razors with good results, including me, but what Mark told me was enlightening.

Ask him and see what he says.

Thanks. That's good info. I got lucky (for once) since mine does not shed. I use it the same as I did the 16K glass stone, no more than 10 laps after a translucent arkie. Polishes the edge and does take the keen-ness up a notch. I believe that I had heard the 16K was another one that was not recommended for razors but many straight razor users loved them.

Seems odd that they would use 'average' for their particle size rather than some sort of sieve apparatus. Maybe that's just too small of a particle to sort.