Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree8Likes
  • 2 Post By Philipp78
  • 1 Post By Kees
  • 2 Post By hatzicho
  • 1 Post By Kees
  • 1 Post By ppetresen
  • 1 Post By Philipp78

Thread: Coticule Layer ID please

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    111
    Thanked: 30

    Default Coticule Layer ID please

    Dear Coticule users,

    for some reason i was not able to start a new thread on coticule.be any more.
    I'd like to identify the layers of 2 coticules i've recently purchased.

    Hope you can help me assigning them to the layer/vein.

    I've taken a picture of them together with other my coticules, which i already know.
    Name:  IMG-3488_small.jpg
Views: 253
Size:  24.6 KB
    The both triangual once on the bottom are under question.

    I'm quite sure both of them are recently mined, the shallow I've purchased as "new" from sharpening shop on ebay, the bigger one - from a forum - member here in Germany.

    The very shallow triangular one was purchased first, originally I was thinking its from La Grise vein, but as I had a bigger triangular one in my hands I got some doupts...
    Both of them have has some grainy looking surface but with following differences:

    The shallow is absoluteley smooth to the touch, feels like a polished glas, none of other my coties does feel like that. Its grain also looks significantly finer compared to the big-triangular one but still much more grainy compared to my La Dressante and la Petite Blanche. it has also more yellowish-orange color to it. While honing i feel a very good draw/sticking/friction. It does very little auto slurry while honing, I can only recognize the autoslurry by looking he edge under the micriscope, the edge shows some fine sporadic scratches among the polished surface. its quite slow on water and moderately fast on slurry.

    The large triangular looks extremley coarse, under the loupe its surface reminds me to a sand dunes in a desert. The surface also feels quite rough to the touch. At its wider side its grain is finer and at its shallow side the grain looks significantly larger. The razor does also feel rough while honing but still leaves a very fine polished edge. Its super slow on water, no way to get the water dark using lightest finishing strokes, I can only see some shallow black line on a tissue after whiping the razor off. On slurry it is moderateley fast, maybe on the slower side.

    Following pictures were taken by my mobile through a 20x magnification glas.
    The Slim triangular's surface:
    Name:  IMG-3498_small.jpg
Views: 248
Size:  35.8 KB


    The wide side of the large triangular one:
    Name:  IMG-3495_small.jpg
Views: 247
Size:  49.8 KB


    The shallow coarse side of the large one:
    Name:  IMG-3497_small.jpg
Views: 245
Size:  57.8 KB


    Just to compare, the surface of my Coti which i've been told is a La Dressante:
    Name:  IMG-3500_small.jpg
Views: 243
Size:  31.8 KB


    And the finest-surface of the La Petite Blanche:
    Name:  IMG-3501_small.jpg
Views: 247
Size:  25.7 KB


    Some additional pics:
    here are the only both stones dry:
    Name:  IMG-3502_small.jpg
Views: 245
Size:  23.5 KB

    wet:
    Name:  IMG-3513_small.jpg
Views: 249
Size:  22.3 KB

    slurried:
    Name:  IMG-3520_small.jpg
Views: 238
Size:  28.6 KB

    Oh yes, the large one has also some barrely visible greyish like-layers os so running diagonal to the surface (also seen on the wet picture):
    Name:  IMG-3514_small.jpg
Views: 245
Size:  44.5 KB


    And on the sides of the large one I can see some pink/orange colorations and some black lines:
    Name:  IMG-3504_small.jpg
Views: 279
Size:  28.6 KB
    Name:  IMG-3509_small.jpg
Views: 247
Size:  23.5 KB
    Name:  IMG-3511_small.jpg
Views: 243
Size:  23.1 KB

    The shallow one has some whitish dots:
    Name:  IMG-3524_small.jpg
Views: 239
Size:  70.3 KB

    Would realy appretiate your help

    Thanks in advnace

    Philipp
    rolodave and hatzicho like this.

  2. #2
    Senior Member blabbermouth Kees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,474
    Thanked: 656

    Default

    The yellowish bout might be a Grosse Jaune. Looks very much like mine.
    If they were quarried recently Ardennes Coticule might know.
    hatzicho likes this.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.

  3. #3
    Preserver of old grinding methods hatzicho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    649
    Thanked: 1230

    Default

    The larger one seems to be most probably a La Grise. At least a lot of typicals like the grainy look and structur especially from the sidematches. Please have a look at Henk's essay about coticules on side 34 and 35. From the pictures a little bit of green hue could also vote for La Verte, but the total appearance tends more to LaGrise - just my guess.
    The yellowish one I am with Kees. Most compliance with Grosse Jaune. Nouveille veine has also these white spots but mor decent. So best guess is Grosse Jaune.

    Regards Peter
    rolodave and ppetresen like this.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    111
    Thanked: 30

    Default

    Hello Peter,

    Thanks a lot, I’ve just had a look to the La Grise documented in Henk‘s „Grinding and Honing Part 4“ (https://bosq.home.xs4all.nl/info%202...whetstones.pdf) and yes - I see similarities to my larger triangular one.
    Also some descriptions which I‘ve found on Coticule.be are indicating it could be a La Grise.

    I‘ve also read somewhere that La Verte is not always that green and could have the same color and structure as my one.
    Do you know what are the differences (beside the color) between La Grise and La Verte?
    I understand that both of them are typically on a slow but fine side of the spectrum.
    Are some significant differences in hardness, draw while honing or in slurry?


    Thanks a lot

    Regards

    Philipp

  5. #5
    Senior Member blabbermouth Kees's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,474
    Thanked: 656

    Default

    That's hard to answer. There are considerable differences between stones from the same layer.
    ppetresen likes this.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    283
    Thanked: 61

    Default

    For the large triangular one I actually would have guessed La Dressant Upper Layer but it sounds like you've maybe excluded it already. Still, as Kees pointed out there is lots of variation between stones of the same layer and La Dressant is a particularly diverse layer.
    rolodave likes this.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    111
    Thanked: 30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ppetresen View Post
    For the large triangular one I actually would have guessed La Dressant Upper Layer but it sounds like you've maybe excluded it already. Still, as Kees pointed out there is lots of variation between stones of the same layer and La Dressant is a particularly diverse layer.
    I was not aware stones from La Dressante layer may have such grainy surface.
    From what I know the appearance within one layer is quite similar to all stones but their sharpening properties (speed on slurry/water, fineness) may vary.
    But I don’t own a large number of specimens from any layer to being able to be certain on that.
    rolodave likes this.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •