Results 11 to 20 of 37
-
01-27-2008, 09:01 PM #11
What would be really helpful
What would be really helpful would be just a simple list with the stones in order:
( I edited out the list I had here and am attaching a Jpeg of the word doc. The word doc was too large to attach).
This is my seat of the pants estimate based on my experience and what is written here, since I have never used a Spyderco stone.
It would be cool if others could fill in stones they have experience with, fitting it into the table between others they have used. I think you need to have used a stone to be able to get it in the right place here.
Over time, we could keep this up and get comments from people to improve the accuracy of it. I think this would be the single greatest service we could offer to people learning to hone.
I could put this in a Microsoft Word Table if people like. For now, we should gather the raw data.
Just my $.02 worth.
PaulLast edited by toolarts; 01-27-2008 at 09:18 PM. Reason: format was bad, more accuracy
-
01-28-2008, 02:57 AM #12
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Peoria AZ
- Posts
- 83
Thanked: 4Great thread, as some one just starting this is giving me some great info. Does any one have an idea where a carborundum hone would go on the list? I know that someone (possibly item description on eBay) said it was about 7k.
-
01-28-2008, 03:31 AM #13
Carborundum
Actually, there is a pretty decent variety of grits for carborundum stones. Home Depot sells them in 100, 200, 400, and I believe 800, but not much higher.
I also have a little carborundum barber hone, I have no idea the grit, but I would place it somewhere in the area of 8,000.
And I have a tiny ancient arkansas stone that must be up around 6k or 8k but no way to identify it. I would exclude these kinds of outliers because people can't purchase them.
My idea here is to list readily available (and identifiable) stone...things someone wanting to hone can go and purchase, to fill a gap in their grinding.
-
01-28-2008, 05:44 AM #14
If you want to maintain the list in Word, then I suggest you convert it to a PDF and attach it. (There are many ways to convert it PDF... primopdf is the one I use and it's free.)
Alternatively, you can get good alignment if you post by selecting a font such as courier new and then invoke the "code" bbcode. EG,
Code:Name Adjusted Cost-US $ Cutting Speed Hardness Norton Grit DMT Black 200 33.00 Fast Hard DMT Blue 325 33.00 Fast Hard DMT Red 600 33.00 Fast Hard DMT Green 1200 33.00 Fast Hard King 1200 1200 35.00 Fast Soft Bester 2000 1200 32.00 Fast Medium Spyderco Med 3000 ? Ultra Fast ? Norton 4K 4000 40.00 Slow Soft King 6000 6000 35.00 Medium Soft Belgian Blue 5000-6000 40.00 Slow Hard Norton 8K 8000 50.00 Medium Soft King 8000 8000 35.00 Fast Soft Spyderco Fine 8000 ? Fast DMT 3 Micron 8000 79.00 Fast Hard Kitayama 1OK -12K 98.00 Medium Soft Finish
-
01-28-2008, 01:29 PM #15
Good general guide
I think this idea has merit and is a good, general guide. I do have to say that comparing grits between different types of stones is very difficult. The problem is not just that the company gives a rating for the stone based on mesh size of the particles that have been baked into the stone but that different materials cut steel differently. A monocrystalline diamond is much more aggressive than a garnet which is a crystal that cleaves readily to present new, sharp edges at the surface of the stone. The silica in an Escher cuts very differently from the silica in an Arkansas stone. On top of it all, in artificial stones like Nortons, Kings, Shaptons, etc., there is a binder which gloms the abrasive particles together in clumps that are bigger than the mesh size of the particles which went into the stone in the first place.
I think we all have different ideas about what a "slow" cutter is vs. a "fast" cutter. To me, the belgian blue cuts steel fast. It's much faster than an Arkansas which I have always found to be slow. The DMT stones cut steel really fast.
This is all fairly relative and subjective data. As I don't see belgian coticules listed below I'm wondering why that is and why they have not been included. They have been the stone of choice for barbers for several hundred years. They finish a razor quickly and are often the only hone used by barbers. I have customers who are barbers on several continents and they won't use anything else. I have had dozens of customers who have tried lots of stones and settle on the coticules. Am I missing something here?
-
01-28-2008, 02:24 PM #16
-
01-28-2008, 05:55 PM #17
Am I missing Something Here
Yes Howard, you are. Here are the sentences you missed from my posting:
"It would be cool if others could fill in stones they have experience with, fitting it into the table between others they have used. I think you need to have used a stone to be able to get it in the right place here. "
"Over time, we could keep this up and get comments from people to improve the accuracy of it. I think this would be the single greatest service we could offer to people learning to hone."
To me it is clear that some stones cut faster than others, and this can be observed by use.
It is also clear to me that some stones are finer than others, and this can be observed by use.
This list does not have to be scientificaly exact--rather--it is a compendium of all of our experience with the stones--to help others get closer to what they need than just guessing and buying the wrong stone.
The information can also be refined by viewers asking follow-up questions here.
I hope this helps explain it.
Paul
-
01-28-2008, 05:57 PM #18
I Volunteer
Another reply because am finding if my reply is too long to fit a computer screen, people don't read it all.
I volunteer to manage this list.
I do not want this list to be MY opinion, but rather a compendium of all our experience (per the original post).
If someone else wants to manage it, they are welcome to, also--just reply here or send me a PM and I will defer.
I think it needs to be done.
Paul
-
01-28-2008, 05:59 PM #19
Another Idea
My sailboat is 100 yards from The Japan Woodworker in Alameda.
Next time I am there, I will go over to the Japan Woodworker and tell them about this project.
I think they might be able to give me some information regarding relative grits of at least the Japanese waterstones and the DMT stones which they carry.
I can also get more accurate pricing.
This may be interesting.
Paul
-
01-28-2008, 06:23 PM #20
Two things- seems to me that the DMT prices listed are a little low. I got my D8C for $35 plus $11 shipping. I have seen them for sale for $55 without shipping included though. Also, despite Howard not liking the stone, shouldn't we throw the Chinese 12k on there? I love it as do most people I have ever heard talk about it. Specs would be Chinese 12k, 12k, $20-30, slow, hard.