Results 11 to 20 of 78
Thread: Chinese 12k question (s)
-
04-04-2009, 07:53 AM #11
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Phoenix
- Posts
- 1,125
Thanked: 156I do not own a Chinese 12k, I started with the spyderco set and frankly, its a little hard to move away from something that works.
That said, the spyderco UF is $40. The Chinese 12k is $30. Come on now...besides from the **** of a time lapping the UF is, the edge is finer and its only $10 more. I don't see the point in the 12k.
Please correct me if I am wrong. I don't own a 12k, I can't see stepping down in grit for a stone that allegedly takes forever to get a polish with.
edti: Plus! You don't have to lap it ever again.
-
04-04-2009, 08:18 AM #12
I've owned & used two of the Chinese 12 k's for about a year and found them identical in use. 2nd one was just smaller than the first house brick size one I bought.
Extremely slow. 100 + passes, closer to 200 but slurry helps a little. I used to use a DMTC for slurry but used to lap on a sheet of glass with fine grit Auto valve grinding paste (water based). Pretty quick to lap that way.
Stiction is a problem on wedges with large bevels, as Sham said blade sticks & skips.
Really great edges for such a cheap hone but hell I'm glad I just got an Escher. Final polish gets done now in a quarter the number of strokes. I've put over 20 razors thru eBay this year & my last hone job was 8 or so razors. I can tell you I was sweating on that Escher to arrive. The China 12's give good results but are not time & energy efficient.Last edited by onimaru55; 04-04-2009 at 08:31 AM.
The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.
-
04-04-2009, 12:06 PM #13
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Berlin
- Posts
- 1,928
Thanked: 402I think the grit size is a bit overrated.
If you compare this stone on a piece of pristine CD or whatever else Acryl
with a BM Slate 6000 (JIS)
its effect is about similar.
Done it here
-
04-04-2009, 02:32 PM #14
I thought I'd chime in since I've used these things before. I've actually used two different ones; JoeD's 8x3 and my smaller one (don't remember the size). I decided to get mine after shaving with Joe's blades that came off his 12K, so that right there should tell you something (about the stone, about Joe's honing, or both).
Anyway, my first experience using the Chinese 12K was at Joe's place. He pulled out a Red Imp 132 that had just come off a Norton 8K and turned me loose. The hone had been soaked, and I was using water with a little bit of dish soap to keep the hone surface wet. I didn't have any issues with sticking, and the blade ran so smoothly over the surface. I don't really know how many laps I did, but it couldn't have been more than one hundred. At Joe's suggestion, I then did the HHT, and hairs were popping. Normally the HHT doesn't impress me, but to go from an 8K to popping without stropping... well I find that impressive.
I've also shaved with a number of blades off the 12K (Joe's and now some of mine), and the blades are consistently sharp. I can definitely feel the difference between blades off my coticule and blades off the 12K. The bevel is also noticeably smoother, to the naked eye and with magnification (a hand-held loupe, don't know the actual magnification but JoeD or CarrieM).
So, to answer the questions that have been posed:
I think the Chinese 12K is a great hone for both its ability to polish and edge and for its price. I also really like the size of the smaller one; I can hand hold it quite easily, and, if turned on its side, I have a one inch wide surface (which could be great for warped or other tricky blades).
I lapped my Chinese 12K with a DMTC, and after that I gave her a good rub-down with a lapped Swaty. I was actually surprised at how quickly the Swaty cut the 12K. Using the Swaty might not have been necessary, but it took out some scratches left by the DMT (it wasn't fully broken in), and I would assume it smoothed out the surface as well.Last edited by holli4pirating; 04-04-2009 at 02:42 PM.
-
04-04-2009, 02:32 PM #15
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795The Chinese hone was the reason I broke down and bought a DMT8XX, 120 grit, after spending about 30 hours lapping mine with a fairly new DMT8C, 325 grit. Aside from taking way too long, the lapping dramatically reduced the cutting performance of my DMT8C. It was this experience that leads me to repeatedly post reminders in this forum that DMT's recommendation is that only the DMT8XX is appropriate for hone lapping.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Utopian For This Useful Post:
JimmyHAD (04-04-2009)
-
04-04-2009, 02:42 PM #16
-
04-04-2009, 02:53 PM #17
To be honest it irritates me that a stone I paid twenty bucks for is so good. I paid wayyyy more for the Eschers and yes they are "better" in a way but I don't know if they are a couple of hundred dollars better. The hell of it is knowing what I know now I would do it again. I guess that is the definition of HAD.
Be careful how you treat people on your way up, you may meet them again on your way back down.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to JimmyHAD For This Useful Post:
Rotavator (12-25-2014)
-
04-04-2009, 03:25 PM #18
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795
-
04-04-2009, 03:32 PM #19
-
04-04-2009, 03:35 PM #20