Results 41 to 48 of 48
Thread: Coticule Slurry BS?
-
01-24-2013, 12:20 AM #41
Thanks fuzzy! Way too cool!
It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled. Twain
-
01-24-2013, 12:37 AM #42
Why not just start a new thread. The OP is long gone.
(The pics are cool)Last edited by zib; 01-24-2013 at 12:56 AM.
We have assumed control !
-
01-24-2013, 12:57 AM #43
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Mid state Illinois
- Posts
- 1,448
Thanked: 247Well now that is NEAT! Finally a real live picture of some umm..what do we call those?? hemisphoids garnets??
I'd read about them, and seen some drawings I believe. But what you've done there is pretty cool.
-
01-24-2013, 01:26 AM #44
That's just too good!! I never thought we'd see this. Besides being informative, it's just, well, cool! Like Justin said.
Thanks for taking the time to do this!!!
Regards,
Howard
-
01-24-2013, 01:30 AM #45
Thank you!
I could look at SEM pics like this all night!
-
01-24-2013, 01:38 AM #46
Cubic rhombic dodecahedron, icositetrahedron Garnet crystal does fine for me.
Jonathan
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Datsots For This Useful Post:
regularjoe (01-24-2013)
-
01-24-2013, 01:50 AM #47
Those phoyographs are amazing. Thank you, please take more!
-
01-24-2013, 02:03 AM #48
Coticule Slurry BS?
Now don't you think that the guys who cut these stones would keep all the "Good Garnets" for themselves. It's just one of the perks of the trade. The real good Garnets alway go to the cutters!(:-).