Results 21 to 30 of 31
-
08-20-2011, 01:46 PM #21
The more I think about this opportunity to lap the stones on the commercial 16k lapper, the more I am thinking about just trying it out for experimentation sake.
I also realize that each hone has its own qualities and is going to react in a such a fashion. I can see that being true with lower grits especially but when you get into higher grits and naturals, how much does lapping and polishing of the stone play into its qualities?Last edited by Grump; 08-20-2011 at 01:59 PM.
-
08-20-2011, 01:51 PM #22
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill S For This Useful Post:
Grump (08-20-2011)
-
08-20-2011, 02:25 PM #23
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,033
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13247
-
The Following User Says Thank You to gssixgun For This Useful Post:
Grump (08-20-2011)
-
08-20-2011, 03:01 PM #24
-
08-20-2011, 03:22 PM #25
I lap all my stones with a 220 dmt lapping plate (not the sharpening plate).
For my higher grit stones i then use sandpaper to remove the scratches left from the DMT. Depending on the stone depends on how high i go. On my Chinese 12k i got to a 400 then to an 800 to give it a glass like feel and i have even tried a 1k (i was told by a few members to get the C12k as polished as much as i can for the best results)
I have both sides of my C12k lapped and the second side i leave with the 220, Both sides feel quite different to sharpen with. The 220 side has a 'zing' sound when using it (if that makes sence) and the polished side has next to no sound when using it. I find the marks in my C12k from my 220 don't disappear but it hold a slurry well and creats a slurry a lot faster then the polished side, i can then transfer some of that slurry across when i flip it.
My shapton 8k and 16k i finish at 600
and most my other stone i finish with a 400 or the 220dmt
I will occasional finish my other 12k stones with a 600 but, at the same time, sometimes the 220 gives it a nice feel different to what the 600 gives.
I have been playing with some new jnats and i have been finishing them with a 1k and even tried 1.5k - i 'think' the 1.5k made a slight difference but not enough to make it worth while. I really should ask one of the pros whats best for lapping the jnats lol but they are supper hard and any marks or scratching takes a long time to disappear!
Still playing and still learning with all my stones. Maybe i will learn something from this thread
Edit: This jnat stone i lapped from a 40 grit lol but it was in really bad condition. I first started with the 220 DMT and when i realised that wasn't working i put in on my belt sander. That didn't do anything so i purchased some 40, 80, 160 grit and so on - Took me 6 hours to get it flat (minus a break here and there and a drive to burnings for some more sandpaper).
But if i had have started with a 40 grit in the first place i think it would have been a 2 hr lap and not a 6 hr lap lolLast edited by Brighty83; 08-21-2011 at 04:54 AM.
-
08-21-2011, 03:36 AM #26The white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.
-
08-21-2011, 04:43 AM #27
-
08-21-2011, 05:08 AM #28
Its sorta relaxing, once i started to see results. lol. Its not something i would want to do too often.
I have done a google for SiC (silicon carbide powder) powders on float glass but i cant find much. The lowest grit i could find was 120. Do you have a site you recommend of the powders and the glass?
-
08-21-2011, 05:21 AM #29
-
08-21-2011, 05:53 AM #30
Gem polishing sites are what you want
Tumbling Grit and Abrasives
Gemcuts Lapidary Supplies - Lapidary & Jewellery Equipment for the Professional or HobbyistThe white gleam of swords, not the black ink of books, clears doubts and uncertainties and bleak outlooks.