Results 31 to 40 of 126
-
03-10-2016, 04:14 PM #31
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Location
- Perth, Western Australia
- Posts
- 318
Thanked: 44
-
03-10-2016, 04:19 PM #32
-
03-10-2016, 04:23 PM #33
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 17,295
Thanked: 3225Yea, stay the course and get it honed for a test shave. If the final angle is within a couple of degrees either side of 17 it has been close enough for me to get a decent shave from. I have a few razors with wide and wavy bevels that shave just fine.
BobLife is a terminal illness in the end
-
03-10-2016, 04:30 PM #34
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Diamond Bar, CA
- Posts
- 6,553
Thanked: 3215Yup, good progress, once you get the bevel fully set, it will not take much effort or time to re-set the angle.
Ink the bevels and spend some time on the toe and heel, adding a finger of pressure and get them to meet. It is not uncommon for the heel and toe to need more attention especially with that much wear and tape.
Also, as said, keep the tape tight and change the top layer as it wears. You will see bits of tape in the swarf and feel it on the stone. If you feel a bump or sticking on the stone, stop and check your tape, probably burned through the top layer.
Good photos and progress.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Euclid440 For This Useful Post:
pcm (03-10-2016)
-
03-10-2016, 04:41 PM #35
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Location
- Perth, Western Australia
- Posts
- 318
Thanked: 44
-
03-10-2016, 04:54 PM #36
-
03-10-2016, 05:07 PM #37
Some small confusion here...
Is the expectation (by numbers being off), that the angle would be too SMALL and hence tape needed to bring it within range?
If that is the case, I'm confused. My measurement is from edge to top of spine. If we go up to the end of the wear, then that length gets smaller, and thereby the angle gets LARGER, which would then imply that adding tape would make it even worse.
For example, if width is 2mm less -> 0.674, then we get 19 degrees (using arcsin, which really is incorrect, but at these angles are similar), and with 5 layers (10 @ .177mm) we get 24 degrees.
I must be missing something. Can someone enlighten me?Regards,
PCM
-
03-10-2016, 05:10 PM #38
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Diamond Bar, CA
- Posts
- 6,553
Thanked: 3215The calculation will vary depending on where you measure the width of the blade, from the top of the spine or the beginning of the spine wear. When you have a few millimeters width of spine wear, that width, can throw the resulting calculation off by several degrees.
The front edge of the wear is probably the best measurement. But just from experience with that amount of wear, that number does look “off”.
I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about the actual angle. Really all that counts is, if it will shave and hold an edge.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Euclid440 For This Useful Post:
pcm (03-10-2016)
-
03-10-2016, 05:13 PM #39
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- North Idaho Redoubt
- Posts
- 27,026
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 13245
Let me see if I can make it clear...
A bevel angle of 15° - 17° is dead nuts normal in fact perfect
Now look at the first pic of the razor in post #1, do you see an issue ???
So obviously this razor is well outside of the norm, the entire geometry has been honed beyond the norm, so the numbers are going to be "Off" unless the razor is reground back into correct geometry..
We have moved beyond the re-grind now, and we are well out onto the experimental limb of the honing tree..
ie: The numbers seem "Off" but he is making progress toward an edge now ..
Hence my statement when I got into this discussion post #6, "I would measure the Bevel angle right now to get an idea of where it is even at, and if there is enough spine left to even do a re-grind.."
It was not even about the bevel angle as it pertained to honing it was in reference to a re-grind possibility...
At post #24 after he was told the bevel angle was high, again I attempted to explain that the bevel angle seemed "off", but he was making progress so to stay at 5 layers and keep honing.
The bevel angle seems "off" because at 17.8° he should need NO tape, or maybe 1 layer to protect the spine, but this razor is not within the norm
In post #30 again I tried to explain that although the bevel angle seems "off", because a 17.8° angle is normal and good, keep the 5 layers because the edge is making progress now..
So again I think we can all agree that the bevel angle seems "off" but he is making progress so stick with it get an edge first, and adjust later if needed..
I hope that helpsLast edited by gssixgun; 03-10-2016 at 05:47 PM.
-
-
03-10-2016, 05:14 PM #40
Thanks! Been about 1 hour on the 220 grit and 2 hours on the 1K, so not bad timewise so far
I'll keep things the same. Does it look like I need to get the edges meeting better (they seem close)? I can continue and see if I get TPT that seems more sharp (though I'm not real skilled at measuring that yet). Cutting arm hair has been hit or miss for me - as my hair is pretty fine. I guess I could test shave to see.Regards,
PCM