Results 21 to 30 of 32
-
08-01-2016, 07:36 PM #21
Do you want to Look at it or Shave with it. Strong advocate for: hone it, strop it, shave with it. By the time you take pictures of it, you could have gone to the Barbers and had them do it.[emoji41]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
08-01-2016, 08:58 PM #22
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795I routinely only look at razors under the scope during the bevel set. That pretty much tells me all that I need to know and it prevents missing things that the most sensitive thumb can miss. I know when my bevels meet in a good edge because I can see it.
AFTER the bevel is set, as confirmed under the scope, I am fine with "hone it, strop it, shave with it."
-
08-01-2016, 09:13 PM #23
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Des Moines
- Posts
- 8,664
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 2591
-
08-01-2016, 09:33 PM #24
- Join Date
- May 2016
- Location
- Sydney, oz
- Posts
- 245
Thanked: 18
-
08-01-2016, 10:40 PM #25
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Des Moines
- Posts
- 8,664
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 2591
-
The Following User Says Thank You to mainaman For This Useful Post:
Utopian (08-02-2016)
-
08-01-2016, 11:44 PM #26
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
- Location
- Virginia, USA
- Posts
- 2,224
Thanked: 481
How on Earth do you find these on facebook?
Well, most everyone came to the same conclusion that I did. Doesn't look like the bevel is meeting. And honestly doesn't even look like it's polished to 4K, much less enough to shave.
Agreed to an extent. My pocket knives are generally cared for on Arkansas stones, so the edge gets pretty wicked IF I have time to go all the way to a translucent. Most days I'll stop on the Hard stone and be happy though. I'll agree that 20K is definitely pointless. The first time you cut anything with that you've more or less ruined half the work you put in to get there. My target is 4-6K, but I like my pocket knives a tad sharper than most.
-
08-02-2016, 01:53 AM #27
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,552
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795Actually, in my opinion only, it is hard to tell what the degree of polish is. The resolution of the camera is insufficient to show the polish.
-
08-02-2016, 04:00 AM #28
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Upper Middle Slobovia NY
- Posts
- 2,736
Thanked: 480I have not spent any time on FB hone stuff. I have had enough people there tell me they are happily shaving with the sweeny todd razors they just picked up to not even care to bother.
-
08-02-2016, 04:31 AM #29
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
- Location
- Virginia, USA
- Posts
- 2,224
Thanked: 481Based on how the blade looked toward the bottom, at a glance the edge just looked rough. In retrospect it's hard to tell if that's low resolution diffusing light reflected off the edge or if it's just not polished to the level it should be. Not that it matters with the bevel not meeting.
-
08-02-2016, 08:04 PM #30
I believe the difference here is that you would not shave with it because you are an experienced honer and know better. I would shave with it because I am a newb. I only trust the shave test at this point- I assume from the photo the bevel is not set, but I would have to test blade on skin to be sure.
Oh, and bad resolution is bad. In this guy's defense maybe he's just a hobbyist who hasn't shelled out the money yet. If he is a so called "pro" and hones for other people then that is another story and the photo is just embarrassing. Humble opinion.