Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38
Like Tree56Likes

Thread: My first try at setting the bevel

  1. #1
    Member cmsessa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    79
    Thanked: 14

    Default My first try at setting the bevel

    Story behind this SR:
    BeeJay honed me two razors and gave me one to try out myself.

    Some pics of the work done:

    1) Unpinning failing as usual. This is the only picture I have where you can see how the blade was:
    Name:  unpining.jpg
Views: 350
Size:  76.5 KB

    BJ said:
    Sometimes you can fix celluloid with acetone.
    Acetone will actually melt celluloid. The idea is to use as little as possible so that the scales don't fully melt. Clean the area very well and put just a bit of acetone on either side of the crack with a Qtip. When the celluloid starts to soften, hold both pieces together and they will eventually harden as one piece.
    It's a very strong repair if you get it right. The trick is to use the right amount of acetone.
    I decided to leave that work for later.

    2) Evaporust
    I started using this product on every SR which has some rust on it.
    Here's after 4-5hs:
    Name:  evaporust.jpg
Views: 337
Size:  18.5 KB

    The blade looks dark, but it goes away with some sanding

    3) After 180-400-600 Sanding:
    Name:  sanding.jpg
Views: 337
Size:  35.4 KB

    4) I taped the blade and this is what they look before:
    Name:  before1ka.jpg
Views: 327
Size:  27.9 KB
    Name:  before1kb.jpg
Views: 321
Size:  35.8 KB

    5) After some X strokes
    Name:  after1ka.jpg
Views: 333
Size:  56.4 KB
    Name:  after1kb.jpg
Views: 362
Size:  50.5 KB


    I doubt you can say much about the pictures but I would like to ask some general questions:

    1) At the beginning, the toe and the heel were not getting a bevel at all. I guess that's my X stroke technique fault. The last strokes I put some pressure on the toe and on the heel and it got a bit better. Is that ok?

    2) Does the "height" of the bevel matter? I noticed that the one I did is thinner than most of the SR pro honed I have. I was going to keep going but decided to stop and ask first.

    3) The bevel I have is already shaving hair from my arm. Is that enough to stop?

    4) I need to get a zoom/magnifying glass. Any recommendation?

    5) What do you think it should be my next step? My stones are: 200/1k Norton, 4k/8k Norton, 12k Naniwa


    Thanks for reading!

  2. #2
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanked: 481

    Default

    1 - Pressure is OK at bevel set. You kind of need it to abrade more steel early on anyway. Make sure you slowly ease up on pressure, so that your final strokes are like finishing strokes. This will make the stria less shallow, and easier to remove on the next hone in the progression.

    2 - If by height, you mean from the shoulder of the bevel to the extreme edge/end - no. How high this is depends on 2 things, angle of honing and thickness of the blade. Thinner grinds will have a shorter bevel.

    3 - might be, might not be. Best way I've found to tell is to hold the razor sharp edge up and look straight down at it with magnification. When you can no longer see where the bevels meet because it's that thin, then you're done setting the bevel.

    5 - if you're done with the 1k, then it'll be time to move on to the 4k. Stay there until the blade stops improving then move on to the 8. Same thing here, but before moving on to the 12K, strop and shave. You should be able to get a comfortable shave off the 8K. If that edge doesn't shave, reassess the edge and drop back. Probably to the 1K because more than likely it'll be a bevel not quite fully set issue.

    As far as magnification here's the most common recommendations:

    https://www.amazon.com/HTS-201X3-Whi...lers+loupe+30x

    https://www.amazon.com/KINGMAS-Pocke...jewelers+loupe

    https://www.amazon.com/Carson-60X-10...jewelers+loupe

    I've got a 30x and a carson 60-100x, but I find myself using the fixed 30x more these days. It's just faster and easier to pull things into focus.
    Jim99 and cmsessa like this.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Marshal For This Useful Post:

    cmsessa (01-17-2017), tinkersd (01-17-2017)

  4. #3
    'with that said' cudarunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Walla Walla in WA State USA
    Posts
    11,156
    Thanked: 4230

    Default

    I've been in contact with the OP from before this was posted via email.

    I'm interested in what others have to say. I think for just beginning with cleaning up razors he's doing alright.

    I would digress or question this:

    2 - If by height, you mean from the shoulder of the bevel to the extreme edge/end - no. How high this is depends on 2 things, angle of honing and thickness of the blade. Thinner grinds will have a shorter bevel.


    As I just honed a 8/8+ quarter grind W&B that took a nice and even edge about 1/32" wide with only one layer of tape on the spine.

    I've honed 5/8 razors that took a lot wider edge. I believe that it depends more on how the razor was ground.

    My Great Grandfather's 5/8+ bevel looks like a snakes track/wide in places and narrow in others. OH! Don't try to tell me that it's 'MY' honing as Glen gets the same results!

    But that's just my thoughts.
    Marshal and cmsessa like this.
    Our house is as Neil left it- an Aladdin’s cave of 'stuff'.

    Kim X

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to cudarunner For This Useful Post:

    tinkersd (01-17-2017)

  6. #4
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanked: 481

    Default

    When referencing thickness, I don't mean spine to edge, I mean from one side of the blade to the other. Or the grind, as you put it Cuda. A wedge for example, will have a taller bevel than a quarter hollow, and so on down the line.

    But how tall the bevel is, or whether it's perfectly uniform all the way down or 'snake tracks' won't effect the shave if honed adequately sharp to perform the task at hand. I'm assuming your great grandfather's razor shaves fine?

  7. #5
    'with that said' cudarunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Walla Walla in WA State USA
    Posts
    11,156
    Thanked: 4230

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal View Post
    When referencing thickness, I don't mean spine to edge, I mean from one side of the blade to the other. Or the grind, as you put it Cuda. A wedge for example, will have a taller bevel than a quarter hollow, and so on down the line.

    But how tall the bevel is, or whether it's perfectly uniform all the way down or 'snake tracks' won't effect the shave if honed adequately sharp to perform the task at hand. I'm assuming your great grandfather's razor shaves fine?
    I believe that we may be talking apples and oranges here.

    When I comment on the 'width' of a bevel I'm referring to how wide it is from the edge toward the spine.

    Now I will fully disagree with your presumption that the width of the edge will vary due to as you said
    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal View Post
    A wedge for example, will have a taller bevel than a quarter hollow, and so on down the line.
    Here's pictures of three different razors to show what I refer to as the 'width' of the bevel. They are all very narrow.

    Please tell me which razor is what size and what grind.

    Name:  005.jpg
Views: 295
Size:  25.9 KB

    Name:  006.jpg
Views: 298
Size:  27.4 KB

    Name:  2nd 002.jpg
Views: 296
Size:  22.1 KB
    gssixgun, sharptonn and Benz like this.
    Our house is as Neil left it- an Aladdin’s cave of 'stuff'.

    Kim X

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to cudarunner For This Useful Post:

    sharptonn (01-17-2017)

  9. #6
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanked: 481

    Default

    I stand corrected. The grind in terms of half/quarter/full hollow is less important because they all get fairly thin toward cutting edge.

    At least not until they're worn down to the spot the blade begins to get wider. I have 2 that fit that description, and now that the hone is having to chew through thicker metal to form the cutting edge the bevel is nearly as thick as my wedge - which has the most monstrous bevel I've seen to date, and it isn't even fully set yet. Still a work in progress.
    sharptonn likes this.

  10. #7
    'with that said' cudarunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Walla Walla in WA State USA
    Posts
    11,156
    Thanked: 4230

    Default

    I'm going to stop commenting as I still believe that we are talking Oranges VS Apples and this isn't helping the OP.
    sharptonn and Marshal like this.
    Our house is as Neil left it- an Aladdin’s cave of 'stuff'.

    Kim X

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to cudarunner For This Useful Post:

    sharptonn (01-17-2017)

  12. #8
    Razor Vulture sharptonn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    25,869
    Thanked: 8588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cudarunner View Post
    I'm going to stop commenting as I still believe that we are talking Oranges VS Apples and this isn't helping the OP.
    Always goes in the honing forum, eh Roy?
    Let's resurrect the JA Norton thread?
    Look at some REAL bevel-setting threads/videos from some long-established members here!

    'Who ya gonna call?'

    It's all up in the search box. Definitely not from inexperience and experimentation. JMHO
    Marshal likes this.

  13. #9
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Diamond Bar, CA
    Posts
    6,553
    Thanked: 3215

    Default

    1) At the beginning, the toe and the heel were not getting a bevel at all. I guess that's my X stroke technique fault. The last strokes I put some pressure on the toe and on the heel and it got a bit better. Is that ok?

    2) Does the "height" of the bevel matter? I noticed that the one I did is thinner than most of the SR pro honed I have. I was going to keep going but decided to stop and ask first.

    3) The bevel I have is already shaving hair from my arm. Is that enough to stop?

    4) I need to get a zoom/magnifying glass. Any recommendation?

    5) What do you think it should be my next step? My stones are: 200/1k Norton, 4k/8k Norton, 12k Naniwa



    1. No, there are times when you might add some pressure, but the razor has a smiling edge and needs a rolling, X stroke. Photo’s 4 & 5, shows the edge is not flat on the stone, because of the slight smile.

    Ink the bevel and perfect your rolling X stroke, until you are consistently removing ink. You want to look at the edge with magnification to ensure you are honing to the edge, and that the bevels are meeting fully, from heel to toe.

    Look straight down on the edge, if you see shinny reflections, the bevel is not fully set.

    Here is a great video of the subtitles of the Rolling X. by Charlie Lewis, (Honing a Smiling Blade). Study that video and note, how little he lifts the blade.

    You can add some pressure or torque to get the heel or toe but more pressure is not the answer for a smiling blade.

    2. No. The width of the blade and thickness of the spine will dictate the Bevel angle and width of the bevel. You can adjust the bevel width somewhat with tape, but it is pretty much dictated by the razor an it’s condition. An excessively worn spine will have a wider bevel than the same razor without wear.


    3. No. The bevel does not look fully set, especially at the toe and heel.
    Look straight down on the edge, with magnification.


    4. There is a good recent thread on magnifiers. You can get a good 60X lighted loupe for as little as $2. The 3 listed in post 2 are good.


    5. Get magnification, you have a good progression. Get with a local mentor to get some hands-on training and master your stones. Do not use the 220 stone.

    It is much easier to hone a razor with scales, and you will probably bugger the edge, when you apply the new scales.
    cmsessa likes this.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Euclid440 For This Useful Post:

    cmsessa (01-17-2017)

  15. #10
    Member cmsessa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    79
    Thanked: 14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cudarunner View Post
    I'm going to stop commenting as I still believe that we are talking Oranges VS Apples and this isn't helping the OP.
    I might be lost in translation but I didn't get a thing about your discussion
    My point was related to the size of the bevel.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •