Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
12-02-2008, 09:56 PM #1
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Buffalo, NY
- Posts
- 61
Thanked: 1Bevel Corners of Hone (any reason not to?)
The reason we bevel the corners of a hone is to avoid doing any damage to that razor sharp edge we are trying to develop. Those non bevelled edges have the potential to do some serious damage.
Should I bevel the edges of my hones considering I have smiling razors? (If so, how much do you guys suggest?)
-
12-02-2008, 10:04 PM #2
Yes, you need to bevel the edges so as to not have the sharp edge of the hone catch the edge of the razor and ruin it. Just put on a small radius along all edges...round like a pencil.
Mark
-
12-02-2008, 11:48 PM #3
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Rochester, MN
- Posts
- 11,544
- Blog Entries
- 1
Thanked: 3795Yup, what he said. It doesn't matter if you are honing flat or using a rolling X, you want to get rid of those corners. It doesn't have to be extreme rounding. I figure if I can see it's rounded with the naked eye, then that's good enough to eliminate the sharp corner. I have seen hones with extreme beveling, even on Eschers, and I consider that to be a waste of stone.
I have seen a lot of others do it, but I don't bother beveling the ends of my hones as I don't see the point when I'm never honing all the way to the end. However, it does look better aesthetically if you uniformly bevel all of the edges.
-
12-03-2008, 12:00 AM #4
i have beveled some edges on a couple of hones, and left a few with the factory edge. i have never had an issue either way. however i have not honed thousands of razors either, so maybe i have just been lucky. experiment and enjoy.
good luck.
vgod
-
12-03-2008, 12:50 AM #5
The universal reason for easing over the edges is they are very sharp on a flat topped, flat sided hone. they can cut you, and are prone to chipping.
the rolling x is a separate issue. I think if you are rolling so much that a minimal chamfer does not solve any issue, then maybe you roll too much.- just a thoughtLast edited by kevint; 12-03-2008 at 01:02 AM.